Review Article
Systematic Review of Total Hip Arthroplasty Outcomes in Cerebral Palsy Patients and a Comparative Analysis with Rheumatoid Arthritis
Table 2
Quality and risk of bias assessment using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS).
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(a) Representativeness of the exposed cohort (), (b) selection of the nonexposed cohort (), (c) ascertainment of exposure (), (d) demonstration that the outcome of interest was not present at the start of the study (), (e) comparability of cohorts (), (f) assessment of outcome (), (g) follow-up was long enough for outcomes to occur (), and (h) adequacy of follow-up (). |