Comprehensive Assessment of Health Impacts from Exposure to Nonionizing Radiation for Healthcare Practitioners Working with MRI and Ultrasound

Table 4

The indicators of the level of quality of life of healthcare practitioners of the diagnostic pool (M ± m, CI 95%).

Indicators	Parameters
	N	M ± m	CI 95%	ME	Q1–Q3	Р1−2−3
MRI diagnostics specialists
Physical and mental well-being	22	81.98 ± 2.04	77.73 : 86.23	82.14	78.6 : 85.7	0.0004
Self-perception	22	80.68 ± 2.30	75.89 : 85.47	81.25	75 : 87.5
Social support	22	81.82 ± 3.23	75.11 : 88.53	83.33	75 : 91.7
Social well-being	22	79.40 ± 2.05	75.13 : 83.67	81.25	71.9 : 87.5	0.039
Level of quality of life	22	80.78 ± 1.56	77.52 : 84.03	79.12	76.0 : 84.4	0.003
Ultrasound diagnostics specialists
Physical and mental well-being	20	68.75 ± 2.76	62.96 : 74.54	67.86	60.7 : 76.8	0.008
Self-perception	20	76.04 ± 3.76	68.17 : 83.9	75	70.8 : 87.5
Social support	20	72.08 ± 4.33	63.02 : 81.14	75	66.7 : 83.3
Social well-being	20	70.31 ± 3.88	62.2 : 78.4	71.87	67.1 : 79.7
Level of quality of life	20	71.51 ± 3.34	64.5 : 78.5	72.92	69.3 : 77.6
Ophthalmologists
Physical and mental well-being	18	79.17 ± 3.09^#	72.65 : 85.68	78.57	75 : 89.28
Self-perception	18	79.17 ± 2.74	73.39 : 84.94	81.25	70.83 : 87.5
Social support	18	78.24 ± 4.21	69.35 : 87.13	83.33	58.3 : 91.7
Social well-being	18	73.96 ± 3.08	67.45 : 80.46	75	68.75 : 84.4
Level of quality of life	18	71.51 ± 3.34^#	71.76 : 82.87	78.12	75 : 84.37

Note: 1— significant difference in Student’s t-test (t) between 1st and 2nd groups; 2—^# significant difference between 2nd and 3rd groups.