Research Article

Comparison of Protective Effects of Phenolic Acids on Protein Glycation of BSA Supported by In Vitro and Docking Studies

Table 1

Molecular docking results for the interaction between phenolic acids and BSA.

CompoundAmino acid residueInteraction typeDistance (Å)Binding energy (kcal mol−1)

Caffeic acidTyr 400Hydrogen bond2.91−7.2
Asn 404Hydrogen bond2.59
Leu 508Hydrophobic494
Lys 542Hydrophobic4.50
Met 547Hydrophobic4.40
Phe 550Hydrophobic3.85

Ellagic acidGlu 424Electrostatic4.71, 4.55−8.7
Ser 428Hydrogen bond3.23
Ala 193Hydrophobic3.81, 4.34, 5.29, 5.39
Arg 196Hydrophobic5.39, 4.79
Arg 458Electrostatic, hydrophobic4.9, 4.15, 3.51, 4.27
His 145Hydrophobic2.0
Arg 144Hydrogen bond2.94

Ferulic acidAla 527Hydrogen bond2.90−6.9
Phe 550Hydrophobic3.92
Thr 578Hydrophobic4.20

Gallic acidTyr 400Hydrogen bond3.05, 3.22−6.3
Asn 404Hydrogen bond2.98, 3.23
Leu 527Hydrophobic2.19, 4.39
Met 547Hydrophobic4.32
Lys 524Hydrogen bond, hydrophobic2.36, 4.58

p-Coumaric acidLeu 531Hydrophobic5.01−7.1
Phe 506Hydrophobic4.52
Val 575Hydrogen bond3.78

Synergic acidIle 289Hydrophobic4.78−6.5
Ala 290Hydrogen bond3.58
His 241Hydrogen bond3.58
Leu 237Hydrophobic4.99
Arg 256Hydrogen bond3.03, 3.13