Isolation and Identification of Effective Probiotics on Drug-Resistant <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i> Strains and Their Biofilms

Abbasi, Zahra; Ghasemi, Seyed Mahdi; Ahmadi, Yasaman; Shokri, Dariush

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/8570521

Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2024 | Article ID 8570521 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/8570521

Isolation and Identification of Effective Probiotics on Drug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Strains and Their Biofilms

Zahra Abbasi,¹Seyed Mahdi Ghasemi,¹Yasaman Ahmadi,²and Dariush Shokri¹

Academic Editor: Tingtao Chen

Received03 Nov 2023

Revised14 Jan 2024

Accepted22 Jan 2024

Published26 Feb 2024

Abstract

Introduction. This study aimed to identify, assess, and isolate strong lactobacilli demonstrating broad antibacterial and anti-biofilm activity against drug-resistant strains of Acinetobacter baumannii. Additionally, the mechanism of inhibition of these organisms was to be determined. Methods. Over a 6-month period (from December 2021 to June 2022), 53 clinical A. baumannii strains were collected from clinical samples. Twenty probiotic strains were isolated from local dairy products. Antibacterial activity of Lactobacillus strains’ cell-free supernatant (CFS) was identified using the agar well diffusion method and the microbroth dilution test. Anti-biofilm effect was performed by the microtiter plate assay. The MTT assay was also used to look into the probiotics’ cytotoxic effects on the L929 fibroblast cell line. Results. During the 6-month period, 53 clinical A. baumannii strains were obtained and identified. Out of 20 lactobacillus strains, the CFS of a lactobacillus strain (named L9) showed an inhibitory effect against all A. baumannii strains. Using the broth microdilution method, it was shown that the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) of CFS extracts of L9 strains against A. baumannii strains were both ¼ mg/mL. The result of the anti-biofilm showed that the selected probiotic could inhibit biofilm formation. The most common organic acid produced by all Lactobacillus strains, according to the HPLC method, was lactic acid, which was followed by acetic acid. The L929 fibroblast cell line was used in the cytotoxicity assay, which revealed that 100% of the cells in the L929 fibroblast cell line survived treatment with successive doses of CFSs for a full day. Conclusion. The probiotic strain isolated from local yogurt in this study showed potential anti-biofilm and antimicrobial properties against all drug-resistant Acinetobacter isolates. Given the increasing interest in probiotic microorganisms based on their high health benefits, further studies are recommended on the mechanisms of action between probiotics and A. baumannii strains to find new solutions for biological control and treatment of these infections without the use of antibiotics.

1. Introduction

Worldwide, the prevalence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) microorganisms is rising, presenting a major health concern to individuals [1, 2]. Hospital-acquired infections caused by MDR strains have resulted in increased treatment costs, mortality, and morbidity, thereby compromising patient safety. In response to the surge in MDR bacteria and the constraints on antibiotic use due to their side effects, researchers are exploring potential alternatives [3, 4]. Living microorganisms, such as probiotic bacteria like lactobacilli, play a pivotal role in human health and constitute the most significant component of both human and animal gut microflora [5]. The probiotic microorganisms can inhibit pathogenic organisms’ growth and pathogenicity. Lactobacillus species are known to generate a diverse range of antimicrobial agents, such as bacteriocins, lactic acids, acetic acids, and other substances, which are found in the culture supernatant of these microorganisms [6].

Acinetobacter baumannii is the most common and harmful nosocomial pathogen causing human infections globally, particularly in critical care units (ICUs) [7]. Infections induced by A. baumannii commonly lead to substantial rates of morbidity and mortality, reaching up to 60%, including ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), septicemia, meningitis, endocarditis, urinary tract infection (UTI), keratitis, and ophthalmitis [8]. A. baumannii has rapidly progressed from MDR to extremely drug-resistant (XDR) due to its evolving antibiotic resistance [9].

Although prescription drugs like carbapenems and fluoroquinolones still exhibit effectiveness against XDR A. baumannii, the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) have increasingly risen, and nearly carbapenems-resistant A. baumannii have been documented [10]. Despite this trend, carbapenems remain the preferred antibiotic therapy for Acinetobacter infections. The lack of effective antibiotics for A. baumannii infection highlights the need for alternative therapies [11].

The extracellular polysaccharide matrices (EPS) that bacteria self-synthesize serve as a protective measure against biofilms [12]. The presence of biofilms introduces various challenges in the medical field, impeding the clinical treatment of persistent infections associated with various indwelling medical devices, as well as diseases connected to chronic and wound-associated illnesses. Research has indicated that the administration of probiotics can assist in the prevention and/or treatment of infections linked to biofilms [13, 14].

It has been discovered that administering probiotics can help prevent and/or treat infections linked to biofilms. The creation of biofilm and bacterial (pathogenic) MDR causes antibiotics to be ineffective in treating infection [15]. Probiotic lactobacilli, including Lactobacillus rhamnosus, seem to have strain-specific antibacterial action, though [16]. Due to its significance, the objectives of this work were to identify, evaluate, and isolate potent lactobacilli with wide antibacterial and anti-biofilm activity against drug-resistant A. baumannii strains, as well as to identify the mechanism of inhibition of these organisms.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection and Identification

A. baumannii were collected from clinical samples, over a six-month period (December 2021 to June 2022). The specimens included respiratory, blood, wounds, burns, surgery, urine, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples obtained from hospitalized patients in three hospitals in the province of Isfahan (Al-Zahra, Amin, and Milad). These samples were cultured on MacConkey agar and blood agar medium (HiMedia, India) and then were incubated for 24 hours at 37°C. Gram staining and biochemical testing were used to identify the pure strains [17].

2.2. Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing

The antibiotic resistance patterns of clinical isolates were assessed using the CLSI-recommended disk diffusion technique [16]. In this study, a range of antibiotics were used including trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (10 µg), ciprofloxacin (5 µg), cefepime (30 µg), ceftazidime (30 µg), piperacillin-tazobactam (10–100 µg), ampicillin-sulbactam (10 µg), gentamicin (10 µg), amikacin (30 µg), and meropenem (10 µg) (BD, USA). A. baumannii ATCC 19606 strains were used as reference strains. Also, a colistin antibiogram was performed using the MIC determination method with the Phoenix BD device.

2.3. Isolation and Identification of Lactobacillus Strains

Samples were collected from various local sources to obtain 20 probiotic strains from local dairy products, including sheep yogurt, cow yogurt, camel milk, cow’s milk, sheep’s milk, goat’s milk, and native buttermilk from different regions of Isfahan province in Iran, namely, Shahreza, Golpayegan, Semirom, Fereydunshahr, and Najafabad. For bacterial isolation, 1 mL of each dairy sample underwent homogenization, was subsequently suspended in a 2% w/v sodium citrate solution (Merck, Germany), and was then introduced into 10 mL of MRS broth (HiMedia, India). After 48 hours, 0.02 mL of the solution was spread over MRS agar media following a 24-hour incubation at 37°C [18].

Various tests, including Gram staining, catalase testing, growth at temperatures of 15°C and 45°C, production of acid and gas from glucose, ammonia production from arginine, and fermentation of sugars (arabinose, cellobiose, mannitol, mannose, melibiose, raffinose, ribose, salicin, rhamnose, and xylose), were utilized for the identification of the strains [19].

2.4. Evaluation of Lactobacillus Strains’ Antibacterial Activity

Agar well diffusion and broth microdilution tests were performed to detect antibacterial activity of Lactobacillus strains.

2.5. Agar Well Diffusion Method

As previously mentioned, the cell-free supernatant (CFS) of Lactobacillus cultures was extracted and utilized in the agar well diffusion procedure [20]. To assess antibacterial activity, the growth inhibition zones surrounding the wells were measured following a 24-hour incubation at 37°C. These inhibition zones were then compared with those observed in the control group.

2.6. Broth Microdilution Assay

To determine the antibacterial activity (MIC and MBC) of CFS of probiotics against clinical isolates of MDR A. baumannii, a broth microdilution test was employed in accordance with previous descriptions [20]. In brief, 100 μL of the diluted (½, ¼, 1/8, and 1/16) CFS of Lactobacillus was transferred to 96-well plates in the presence of MRS broth medium. A 96-well plate containing the produced suspension (10⁸ CFU/ml) was then cultivated and incubated for 24 h at 37°C. After that, it was cultured on blood agar medium and kept at 37°C for another 24 hours [21]. The positive and negative controls were the wells devoid of bacteria and extract, respectively. By measuring optical density (OD470 nm), MIC and MBC, representing the lowest concentrations of CSF capable of inhibiting the growth of the pathogen and eradicating all pathogenic bacteria, were determined [22].

2.7. Time-Kill Test in Cocultures

By coculturing in microtiter plates, the probiotic was tested for its ability to kill the Acinetobacter strain after a minimum period of time. Lactobacillus and A. baumannii isolates were cultivated in trypticase soy broth (TSB) and MRS broth, respectively. Once the A. baumannii strain had been diluted to a 0.5 McFarland turbidity, a suspension of the isolates was prepared. Subsequently, a mixture comprising 100 μL of cell-free supernatant (CFS) from a coculture of Lactobacillus strains and 100 μL of A. baumannii was prepared in a 96-well microtiter plate and incubated for 24 hours at 37°C. To assess the inhibitory or bactericidal effects, aliquots from the coculture suspension were cultured on blood agar at 1-hour intervals (1 h, 2 h, 4 h, 8 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 48 h) and incubated at 37°C for 24 hours [23]. Each experiment was conducted in duplicate and repeated three times.

2.8. Assessment of Acid Tolerance of Probiotic

The Lactobacillus strains were inoculated into MRS broth and incubated for 48 h at 37°C. Then, the Lactobacillus strains were inoculated into PBS (pH1, pH2, and pH3, pH4 (control)) and PBS (pH4 as control) and incubated for 0, 30 min, and 1 hour, at 37°C. After that, MRS agar was spread out to a density of 50 g/ml, and it was incubated at 37°C for 24 h. The vitality of Lactobacillus strains exposed to normal conditions and acidic conditions (pH1, pH2, and pH3) was used to measure the acidic tolerance. This experiment was repeated in duplicate.

2.9. Anti-Biofilm Effect of Lactobacilli

For this purpose, the microtiter plate test was utilized. Initially, the bacteria were cultured in MRS medium for one day at 37°C. Suspensions (0.5 McFarland standard) from this culture were then inoculated into MRS medium (supplemented with 0.2% sucrose) containing ½, ¼, and 1/8 MICs of the CFS extracts. A volume of 200 μL of this solution was added to each well of a 96-well microplate. The positive and negative controls were represented by wells without microorganisms and without CFS, respectively. The microplate was incubated at 37°C for 24 hours. Subsequently, the wells were emptied, and crystal violet was added, followed by cleaning with 95% ethanol. Finally, the optical density (OD) of crystal violet associated with biofilms was measured at a wavelength of 570 nm. The experiments were performed three times, utilizing A. baumannii ATCC 196006 as a positive control and an uninfected medium as a negative control [22].

2.10. Determining the Possible Inhibitory Mechanism

The test was performed to determine whether the inhibitory and antimicrobial effects of the CFS of probiotics were due to the presence of organic acids or other mechanisms. Therefore, to probiotics with pH 4, add 4 drops of NaOH (sodium hydroxide) to neutralize (pH 7), and then in a tube of neutral probiotics and in the other tube, the main probiotic supernatant is placed. Agar well diffusion method on the Muller Hinton agar used as previously described. The plates were cultivated with the 0.5 McFarland turbidity (A. baumannii), create four wells with a sterile glass Pasteur pipette and fill two of them with neutral probiotics (pH=7) and two of them with main probiotics (pH=4), then plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. In parallel, the suspension equivalent to 0.5 McFarland turbidity of Acinetobacter (in a volume of 1000 microliter) was poured into a sterile tube with a screw cap, and the same volume of neutral probiotics was added. The tube was then placed in the incubator. After 4 h, 50 microliter of it was cultured on chocolate agar medium at 37°C for 24 h [18].

2.11. High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)

The identified Lactobacillus strains were cultured in MRS broth medium for 72 hours, after which the culture was centrifuged at 10,000 g for 10 minutes. Following centrifugation, the supernatant was separated from the bacterial pellet and then filtered through a 0.25 µm syringe filter.

To confirm the sterility of the filtrate and absence of Lactobacilli growth, a reculturing step in MRS broth medium was conducted for an additional 72 hours. HPLC was carried out using twenty microliters of CFS, employing a flow rate of 1 mL·min⁻¹, maintaining pH at 3.6, and utilizing reversed-phase HPLC columns (C18, 25 cm × 4.6 mm) with an aqueous mobile phase (phosphate buffer-CH3CN 10 mM). Figure 1 shows the (UV) absorbance measured at room temperature at 25°C [24].

(a)

(b)

2.12. MTT Assay

Purchased from the Pasteur Institute in Tehran, Iran, normal subcutaneous connective tissue (L929) cell lines were cultivated in DMEM low glucose medium with 10% FBS and antibiotics (including 50 μg/ml of streptomycin and 50 U/ml of penicillin). The cells were incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2 and 90% humidity. After 24 h, 20 microliter of the probiotic supernatant was filtered twice with a 0.22-micron syringe filter. Then, added and dilution was done in 5 dilutions 1, 0.5, 0.25, 0.125, and 0.062. The microplates were then incubated at 37°C for 24hours. Each research group's cells were incubated at 37°C for 4 h after being exposed to 50 μL of the MTT reagent (5 mg/ml in sterile PBS). To dissolve the formazan crystals, 50 μl of DMSO was added after the culture media had been taken out. The findings were determined using a microplate reader from Bio-Tek Instruments, Inc. of Vermont, USA, at an absorbance of 570 nm [25, 26].

The percentage of cell viability was calculated usingwhere A₅₇₀: the absorbance at 570 nm; sample: a monolayer of every cell line plus different treatment concentrations in RPMI media; blank: different treatment concentrations in RPMI medium; and control: a monolayer of every cell line plus RPMI medium with no modifications.

2.13. Identification of Selected Lactobacilli

DNA was extracted from pure cultures made from bacterial colonies and stored at −20°C as previously described. By using the universal primers (CinnaGen Co, Iran) [18], the bacteria identified using these traditional tests were verified. Universal 1 (27f): AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG. Universal 2 (1492r): TACGGYTACCTTGTTACGACTT.

Using the following steps, the 16S rRNA gene was amplified: initial denaturation at 95°C for 5 minutes, 30 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 30 seconds, annealing at 54°C for 30 seconds, extension at 72°C for 30 seconds, and a final extension cycle at 72°C for five minutes. Direct sequencing was employed at Bio Magic Gene, Inc., Karaj, Iran, to locate the nucleotide sequences of successful PCR products. The sequences were matched with the NCBI’s BLAST search results and then registered.

3. Results

3.1. A. baumannii Isolation and Antibiotic Sensitivity Pattern

During the 6-month period (December 2021 to June 2022) of sample collection, 53 clinical A. baumannii strains were obtained and identified from various clinical samples including respiratory secretions (37.7%) (20/53), followed by urine (24.5%) (13/53), blood (18.9%) (10/53), wound (15.1%) (8/53), and CSF (3.8%) (2/53).

Antibiotic susceptibility patterns showed that 6 (11.3%), 43 (81.1%), and 4 (7.5%) strains were MDR, XDR, and PDR, respectively.

The most effective antibiotic against them was colistin with only 11.3% resistance, while high percentages of resistance were observed against meropenem (100%), piperacillin/tazobactam (100%), and ciprofloxacin (100%). The full antibiotic susceptibility pattern of A. baumannii isolates is presented in Figure 2.

3.2. Probiotics Isolation and Identification

Based on our findings, 20 Lactobacillus strains were identified from local yogurt and milk samples, and their antimicrobial properties against strains of A. baumannii were taken into account. Out of 20 Lactobacillus strains, the CFS of one strain (L9) demonstrated an inhibitory effect (showing inhibition zones with a diameter of 14 mm) against every strain of A. baumannii in the well diffusion method, according to the results. For this reason, in the remaining trials, the CFSs of the L9 strain were employed.

After 24 hours of incubation, the results showed that L9 was able to grow at pH 1, pH 2, and pH 3 after zero, 30 minutes, and one hour despite variations in the degree of viability. In this test, pH 4 is considered as a positive test.

3.3. Antimicrobial Effect of Probiotics against A. baumannii

Using the broth microdilution method, it was shown that the MICs and MBCs of CFS extracts of L9 strains against A. baumannii strains were both ¼ mg/mL and the ratio of the concentration of MIC and MBC was similar.

Furthermore, no change in OD was observed in the findings of the liquid coculture assay, and after 24 h, the isolates of A. baumannii demonstrated 100% suppression of growth. This demonstrated that all A. baumannii growth was suppressed by L9 Lactobacillus strains. Additionally, when A. baumannii strains were inoculated and cultured in blood agar medium, no growth of those strains was seen as compared to positive controls of A. baumannii strains without lactobacilli coculture (the killing effect was 100%). Moreover, the minimum time required to inhibit A. baumannii strains is only one hour by probiotics, which shows the potential properties of probiotics. Also, L9 strains exhibited tolerance to acid (pH 1, 2, and 3) after 0, 30 min, and 1 hour, respectively (Figure 3).

In addition to Gram staining and biochemical tests, the analysis of phylogenetic relationships based on 16S rDNA indicated a close relationship of both Lactobacillus strains to L. rhamnosus. The 16S rRNA sequences employed in this study have been assigned NCBI GenBank accession numbers OK637289 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/OK637289.1/) and OK637331 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/OK637331).

3.4. Antibiotic Susceptibility

Among the antibiotics tested, the L9 strain was sensitive to ampicillin, penicillin, tetracycline, linezolid, rifampin, erythromycin, ciprofloxacin, clindamycin, nitrofurantoin, and gentamicin and resistant to teicoplanin, trimethoprim, and vancomycin.

3.5. Anti-Biofilm Activity of Probiotic

The outcome of the probiotics’ anti-biofilm inhibitory effect demonstrated that, at concentrations of 1, ½, and ¼, the chosen probiotic was able to inhibit biofilm formation and prevent the formation of A. baumannii strains; however, at concentrations of 1/8 and 1/16, A. baumannii strains formed biofilm, and the probiotic strain was unable to inhibit them (Figure 4).

Investigation of probable inhibition mechanism of L9 strains showed that in contrast to pH 7, in pH 4, the CSF of strain L9 had inhibition zones against A. baumannii isolates in the well diffusion method. On the other hand, neutralized supernatants (pH 7) of L9 strains did not have any inhibitory activity against A. baumannii, which showed that the inhibitory effects of the L9 strains were due to their organic acid production.

Through the use of HPLC, an assessment of the variety and amount of organic acids generated by different Lactobacillus strains revealed that lactic acid and acetic acid were the dominant organic acids produced by all strains. The concentrations of lactic acid and acetic acid were 3.2 gr/ml and 0.5 gr/ml, respectively (Figure 1).

The cytotoxicity test against the L929 fibroblast cell line showed that cell viability of L929 fibroblast cell following treatment with serial concentrations of CFSs for 24 h was 100%. These results were not different from the control bacteria sample (100%).

4. Discussion

Globally, MDR-A. baumannii strains causing nosocomial infections lead to a growing concern due to high mortality rates and limited treatment options [27, 28]. Most of their important features include survivability in the hospital environment and rapid resistance to various antibiotics. Therefore, alternative treatment methods, such as probiotics, are sought to prevent or treat nosocomial infections [29].

In the present study, A. baumannii strains were isolated from various clinical samples to evaluate their antibiotic susceptibility patterns. Additionally, different probiotic strains were isolated from local dairy products to identify a strain with effective antimicrobial activity against Acinetobacter strains and investigate their probiotic benefits.

In this study, a large number of A. baumannii strains were isolated from various clinical samples, including blood, respiratory secretions, wounds, and urine, respectively, which almost corresponds to studies conducted until now [30, 31]. The results of this study, along with other investigations on the isolation of A. baumannii strains, suggest a higher prevalence of this bacterium in respiratory secretions, blood, wounds, and urine samples.

In the current study, the highest sensitivity rate was reported for colistin (88.7%) while ampicillin-sulbactam (1.9%) and gentamicin (3.7%) showed the least susceptibility. The highest resistance was observed for meropenem, ciprofloxacin, and piperacillin-tazobactam antibiotics. This study highlights colistin as the most effective antibiotic. Consistent with results from studies in Iran, A. baumannii strains demonstrate significant resistance to currently prescribed antibiotics [32–35].

In a study conducted in Mashhad [16], all isolates were MDR, with imipenem, meropenem, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, cefixime, cefotaxime, and cephalexin showing the greatest level of resistance (100%) among the isolates. Conversely, the least resistance (19.4%) was found against polymyxin B. This study’s outcomes support our conclusions [16]. Similarly, in line with the present study, Nouri et al. and Azimi et al. presented evidence of low sensitivity to meropenem and imipenem in A. baumannii isolates, which were resistant to these antibiotics to a large extent [36, 37].

An Iranian meta-analysis examined antibiotic resistance patterns among isolates of A. baumannii from ICU-hospitalized patients. The results revealed that the most antibiotic resistance was observed to ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, cefixime, cefotaxime, imipenem, and meropenem, while colistin and polymyxin B exhibited the highest sensitivity. The results of the present study are in agreement with this review and meta-analysis [38].

Contrary to our results regarding the high resistance of the isolates to piperacillin-tazobactam, Azimi et al. reported high sensitivity to this antibiotic [37, 38]. The discrepant results of this study with the mentioned studies can be attributed to the type of examined samples, the use of different antibiotic disks, and variations in geographical locations. Additionally, the overuse of this antibiotic in hospitals could explain the discrepancy.

Lactic acid-producing bacteria are probiotics with anti-inflammatory and antibacterial properties that have been mostly studied in various fields. Lactobacilli, belonging to the Lactobacillaceae family, are the most important and frequently studied microorganisms within this family, encompassing numerous identified species [39].

The results of the agar well diffusion method showed that only one probiotic isolated from local yogurt could create growth inhibition zones on all A. baumannii strains. Molecular studies confirmed the identification of our selected probiotic as L. rhamnosus, determined through biochemical and molecular PCR tests. In this research, L. rhamnosus exhibited a remarkably broad-spectrum activity with inhibitory and lethal effects on all strains of the A. baumannii pathogen. The examined probiotic demonstrated a highly effective inhibitory impact in the microtiter plate and coculture method and in determining MIC and MBC. Notably, the MIC and MBC values were equal to ¼ concentration after the coculture of this probiotic bacterium with Acinetobacter strains. This means that the probiotic could inhibit and, additionally, kill the pathogen at this concentration, indicating the potential value of L. rhamnosus. The results of the lethal time test also showed that the studied probiotic could kill the Acinetobacter strains only after one hour, which is a valuable result.

Probiotic bacteria have beneficial antibacterial effects through biofilm formation [40]. This study evidenced the strong anti-biofilm effects of L. rhamnosus, effectively preventing replacement, adhesion, and biofilm development by Acinetobacter strains through its own biofilm formation. The inhibitory effect of probiotics on biofilm formation by pathogenic strains has been investigated in numerous research studies.

In a research conducted in India, it was documented that Lactobacillus gasseri, obtained from the feces of infants, exhibited antagonistic and antimicrobial properties against pathogenic bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecium, Enterobacter, Klebsiella pneumoniae, A. baumannii, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa [41].

Sultan Dalal et al. reported the antagonistic activity of L. plantarum and L. fermentum isolated from the feces of healthy infants, against nosocomial infections caused by A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa [42]. The antimicrobial effect of L. plantarum and L. piscium strains isolated from goat milk against A. baumannii was reported by Fezoni et al. [43]. According to the promising antimicrobial effects of these probiotics, goat milk could be used as an adjuvant treatment for these infections [43].

In a study conducted in the United States [44], topical treatment with the supernatants of Lactobacillus acidophilus, L. casei, and L. reuteri was used on mouse wounds infected with A. baumannii. The results showed that the antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory effects of probiotics with local treatment could enhance wound healing [44]. The study, in general, demonstrated that the topical application of some Lactobacillus species can be effective against the Gram-negative pathogen A. baumannii.

Guan et al. conducted a study on the antibacterial properties, specifically against Bacillus subtilis and Salmonella enterica and an anti-biofilm of L. rhamnosus. The antibacterial activity of L. rhamnosus cells was different under different culture conditions, and the intensity of antibacterial effects was found to be unrelated to the biomass. Additionally, an isolated cell-surface extract revealed a wide spectrum of antimicrobial and anti-biofilm capacity. The main components of the extract were identified as polysaccharides and proteins. The properties of the extract indicated that it might be a type of biosurfactant [44].

In another study, CFS extracts of L. casei and L. rhamnosus were found to be exhibiting antagonistic and anti-biofilm effects against S. aureus. This finding suggests that future research could lead to the development of drugs derived from these CFSs to combat S. aureus infections [45].

The use of probiotics and their metabolites presents a promising strategy to prevent biofilm growth by various pathogenic microorganisms. In the present study, in addition to the appropriate antimicrobial and anti-biofilm properties of the L. rhamnosus strain, other investigated properties include the bile-esculin test, 6.5% salt tolerance, catalase, DNase, hemolysis, CAMP, and cold enrichment, as well as the acid resistance assay and MTT test.

A negative 6.5% salt tolerance test was reported in the current study, consistent with de Vries et al. who reported a low growth of Lactobacilli in a salt concentration of ≥5%, and the survival percentage decreased at high salt concentrations [46].

The inhibitory mechanism of the L. rhamnosus strain was evaluated in this investigation. To confirm the presence of organic acids in L. rhamnosus, the potential inhibitory mechanism was initially determined.

The results showed that the probiotic’s inhibitory activity of the probiotic was due to the presence of strong organic acids. In another step, the presence of acetic acid and lactic acid and their concentrations were evaluated using HPLC. The analysis of organic acids in the L. rhamnosus supernatant revealed levels of 0.5 g/l for acetic acid and 3.2 g/l for lactic acid. These results strongly suggested that the inhibitory activity of L. rhamnosus was primarily due to the presence of organic acids, namely, acetic acid and lactic acid.

5. Conclusion

In this study, the probiotic strain isolated from local yogurt showed potential anti-biofilm and antimicrobial properties against all drug-resistant Acinetobacter isolates. Given the increasing interest in probiotic microorganisms due to their significant health benefits, further studies are recommended on the mechanisms of action between probiotics and A. baumannii strains to find new solutions for biological control and treatment of these infections without the use of antibiotics.

Data Availability

Data are available on request from the authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

Financial backing for this study was provided through a grant from Shahid Ashrafi Esfahani University in Isfahan, Iran.

References

K. Sambanthamoorthy, X. Feng, R. Patel, S. Patel, and C. Paranavitana, “Antimicrobial and antibiofilm potential of biosurfactants isolated from lactobacilli against multi-drug-resistant pathogens,” Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation Microbiology, vol. 14, pp. 197–199, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Hasannejad-Bibalan, A. Mojtahedi, H. Biglari, M. Halaji, and H. Sedigh Ebrahim-Saraie, “Antibacterial activity of tedizolid, a novel oxazolidinone against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Microbial Drug Resistance, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 1330–1337, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C.-F. Lin, M.-Y. Lin, C.-N. Lin et al., “Potential probiotic of Lactobacillus strains isolated from the intestinal tracts of pigs and feces of dogs with antibacterial activity against multidrug-resistant pathogenic bacteria,” Archives of Microbiology, vol. 202, no. 7, pp. 1849–1860, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Halaji, A. Feizi, A. Mirzaei et al., “The global prevalence of class 1 integron and associated antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli from patients with urinary tract infections, a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Microbial Drug Resistance, vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 1208–1218, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Hasaniani, M. Ghasemi-Kasman, M. Halaji, and S. Rostami-Mansoor, “Bifidobacterium breve probiotic compared to lactobacillus casei causes a better reduction in demyelination and oxidative stress in cuprizone-induced demyelination model of rat,” Molecular Neurobiology, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 498–509, 2023.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Iqbal, S. Ahmed, N. Tabassum, R. Bhattacharya, and D. Bose, “Role of probiotics in prevention and treatment of enteric infections: a comprehensive review,” 3 Biotech, vol. 11, no. 5, p. 242, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Stanbro, J. M. Park, M. Bond, M. G. Stockelman, M. P. Simons, and C. Watters, “Topical delivery of lactobacillus culture supernatant increases survival and wound resolution in traumatic Acinetobacter baumannii infections,” Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 809–818, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Kumar, R. Anwer, and A. Azzi, “Virulence potential and treatment options of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Acinetobacter baumannii,” Microorganisms, vol. 9, no. 10, p. 2104, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Ibrahim, N. Al-Saryi, I. M. Al-Kadmy, and S. N. Aziz, “Multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii as an emerging concern in hospitals,” Molecular Biology Reports, vol. 48, no. 10, pp. 6987–6998, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Mei, T. Yang, J. Wang, R. Wang, and Y. Cai, “Efficacy and safety of tigecycline in treatment of pneumonia caused by MDR Acinetobacter baumannii: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 74, no. 12, pp. 3423–3431, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Mirzaei, Z. N. Bazgir, H. R. Goli, F. Iranpour, F. Mohammadi, and R. Babaei, “Prevalence of multi-drug resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) phenotypes of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii isolated in clinical samples from Northeast of Iran,” Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation Research Notes, vol. 13, pp. 380–386, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Shelly, M. Kuk, O. Menashe, G. Zeira, S. Azerrad, and E. Kurzbaum, “Nitrate removal from a nitrate-rich reverse osmosis concentrate: superior efficiency using the bioaugmentation of an Acinetobacter biofilm,” Journal of Water Process Engineering, vol. 44, Article ID 102425, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. E. Kuc, S. Azerrad, O. Menashe, and E. Kurzbaum, “Efficient biodegradation of phenol at high concentrations by Acinetobacter biofilm at extremely short hydraulic retention times,” Journal of Water Process Engineering, vol. 47, Article ID 102781, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. M. Colquhoun and P. N. Rather, “Insights into mechanisms of biofilm formation in Acinetobacter baumannii and implications for uropathogenesis,” Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, vol. 10, p. 253, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. J. Mea, P. V. C. Yong, and E. H. Wong, “An overview of Acinetobacter baumannii pathogenesis: motility, adherence and biofilm formation,” Microbiological Research, vol. 247, Article ID 126722, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. M. Abdelhameed and A. S. Hasen, “Probiotic inhibit biofilm formation for acinetobacter baumannii,” Human immunodeficiency virus Nursing, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 1670–1675, 2022.
View at: Google Scholar
B. N. Ames, F. D. Lee, and W. E. Durston, “An improved bacterial test system for the detection and classification of mutagens and carcinogens,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 782–786, 1973.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Ghiaei, S. M. Ghasemi, and D. Shokri, “Investigating the antagonistic effect of indigenous probiotics on carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2023, Article ID 6645657, 8 pages, 2023.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. A. Svetoch, B. V. Eruslanov, V. P. Levchuk et al., “Isolation of Lactobacillus salivarius 1077 (NRRL B-50053) and characterization of its bacteriocin, including the antimicrobial activity spectrum,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 77, no. 8, pp. 2749–2754, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Shokri, M. R. Khorasgani, M. Mohkam, S. M. Fatemi, Y. Ghasemi, and A. Taheri-Kafrani, “The inhibition effect of lactobacilli against growth and biofilm formation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa,” Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 34–42, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Pfaller and D. Diekema, “Progress in antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida spp. by use of Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute broth microdilution methods, 2010 to 2012,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 50, no. 9, pp. 2846–2856, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Soltani, S. Abbasi, S. Baghaeifar et al., “Antibacterial and antibiofilm activity of Lactobacillus strains secretome and extraction against Escherichia coli isolated from urinary tract infection,” Biotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands), vol. 36, Article ID 760, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Laal-Kargar, S. Dolatabadi, and M. Mohtashami, “Antibacterial and antibiofilm effects of synbiotics against multidrug-resistant bacteria: acinetobacter baumannii and Enterococcus faecalis,” 2020, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340194202_Antibacterial_and_Antibiofilm_Effects_of_Synbiotics_against_Multidrug-Resistant_bacteria_Acinetobacter_baumannii_and_Enterococcus_faecalis.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Yousefi, M. B. Habibi Najafi, M. R. Edalatian Dovom, and A. M. Mortazavian, “Production of angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitory peptides in Iranian ultrafiltered white cheese prepared with Lactobacillus brevis KX572382,” International Journal of Food Science and Technology, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 2530–2538, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Kawarizadeh, F. Nojoomi, M. Tabatabaei, S. Hosseinzadeh, and M. Farzaneh, “The effect of Bacillus coagulans on cytotoxicity and apoptosis induced by Salmonella Typhimurium in HT-29 cell culture,” Iranian Journal of Microbiology, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 305–312, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Shokryazdan, M. Faseleh Jahromi, J. B. Liang, and Y. W. Ho, “Probiotics: from isolation to application,” Journal of the American College of Nutrition, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 666–676, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Rezaei, H. Fazeli, M. Moghadampour, M. Halaji, and J. Faghri, “Determination of antibiotic resistance pattern and prevalence of OXA-type carbapenemases among Acinetobacter baumannii clinical isolates from inpatients in Isfahan, central Iran,” Infezioni in Medicina, Le, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 61–66, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Halaji, A. Rezaei, M. Zalipoor, and J. Faghri, “Investigation of class I, II, and III integrons among acinetobacter baumannii isolates from hospitalized patients in isfahan, Iran,” Oman Medical Journal, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 37–42, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. O. Vrancianu, I. Gheorghe, I. B. Czobor, and M. C. Chifiriuc, “Antibiotic resistance profiles, molecular mechanisms and innovative treatment strategies of acinetobacter baumannii,” Microorganisms, vol. 8, no. 6, p. 935, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Rezaei, H. Fazeli, M. Halaji, M. Moghadampour, and J. Faghri, “Prevalence of metallo-beta-lactamase producing Acinetobacter baumannii isolated from intensive care unit in tertiary care hospitals,” Annali di Igiene: Medicina Preventiva e di Comunita, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 330–336, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. A. Kanafani, N. Zahreddine, R. Tayyar et al., “Multi-drug resistant Acinetobacter species: a seven-year experience from a tertiary care center in Lebanon,” Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 9, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Kamali, S. Manshouri, Y. Bagheri et al., “Prevalence and antibiotic resistance of Acinetobacter baumannii among patients in postcardiac surgery intensive care units of Rajaei Hospital, Tehran,” Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran, vol. 34, p. 4, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Lupo, M. Haenni, and J. Y. Madec, “Antimicrobial resistance in acinetobacter spp. and Pseudomonas spp,” Microbiology Spectrum, vol. 6, no. 3, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Keshavarz-Hedayati, R. Shapouri, N. Habibollah-Pourzereshki, R. Bigverdi, and A. Peymani, “Molecular investigation of resistance to disinfectants in acinetobacter baumannii isolates collected from qazvin hospitals, Iran (2017),” The Journal of Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 2–13, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Moradi, F. B. Hashemi, and A. Bahador, “Antibiotic resistance of acinetobacter baumannii in Iran: a systemic review of the published literature,” Osong public health and research perspectives, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 79–86, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Nouri, F. Kamarehei, B. Asghari, M. Hazhirkamal, A. R. Abdollahian, and M. Taheri, “Prevalence and drug resistance patterns of bacteria isolated from wound and bloodstream nosocomial infections in Hamadan, West of Iran,” Life, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 174–182, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Armin, F. Fallah, A. Karimi et al., “Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance patterns in ESKAPE pathogens in Iran,” Archives of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, vol. 11, no. 1, Article ID 129629, 2023.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Keikha, M. Karbalaei, F. Rahimi, and A. Talebi Bezmin Abadi, “The prevalence of antibiotic-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections among the Iranian ICU patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Gene Reports, vol. 30, Article ID 101731, 2023.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Fijan, “Microorganisms with claimed probiotic properties: an overview of recent literature,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 4745–4767, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Barzegari, K. Kheyrolahzadeh, S. M. Hosseiniyan Khatibi, S. Sharifi, M. Y. Memar, and S. Zununi Vahed, “The battle of probiotics and their derivatives against biofilms,” Infection and Drug Resistance, vol. 13, pp. 659–672, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Rastogi, V. Mittal, and A. Singh, “Selection of potential probiotic bacteria from exclusively breastfed infant faeces with antagonistic activity against multidrug-resistant ESKAPE pathogens,” Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 739–750, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. M. Soltan Dallal, A. Davoodabadi, M. Abdi et al., “Inhibitory effect of Lactobacillus plantarum and Lb. fermentum isolated from the faeces of healthy infants against nonfermentative bacteria causing nosocomial infections,” New microbes and new infections, vol. 15, pp. 9–13, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Fozouni, M. Yaghoobpour, and A. Ahani Azari, “Probiotics in goat milk: a promising solution for management of drug-resistant acinetobacter baumannii,” Jorjani Biomedicine Journal, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 31–38, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Stanbro, J. M. Park, M. Bond, M. G. Stockelman, M. P. Simons, and C. Watters, “Topical delivery of lactobacillus culture supernatant increases survival and wound resolution in traumatic acinetobacter baumannii infections,” Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 809–818, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Soleimani, N. Saidi, H. Saderi, and P. Owlia, “Anti-biofilm potential of Lactobacillus casei and Lactobacillus rhamnosus cell-free supernatant extracts against Staphylococcus aureus,” Advanced Biomedical Research, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 50, 2023.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. C. de Vries, E. E. Vaughan, M. Kleerebezem, and W. M. de Vos, “Lactobacillus plantarum—survival, functional and potential probiotic properties in the human intestinal tract,” International Dairy Journal, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 1018–1028, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2024 Zahra Abbasi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

257

Downloads

175

Citations