Research Article
Comparison of Risk Scores for Predicting Adverse Outcomes in Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding
Table 2
Performance of different risk scores in comparison with the Oakland score in the prediction of adverse outcomes.
| | Rebleeding | Blood transfusion | Hemostatic intervention | Any adverse outcome | (25.2%) | (18.7%) | (28.5%) | (47.2%) |
| Oakland | 0.67 (0.56-0.78) | 0.97 (0.94-0.99) | 0.66 (0.55-0.78) | 0.78 (0.70-0.87) | Birmingham | 0.60 (0.48-0.72) | 0.93 (0.89-0.97) | 0.70 (0.59-0.80) | 0.74 (0.65-0.83) | | | | | SALGIB | 0.64 (0.52-0.76) | 0.95 (0.91-0.99) | 0.71 (0.61-0.81) | 0.78 (0.70-0.86) | | | | | SHA2PE | 0.68 (0.57-0.78) | 0.84 (0.78-0.91) | 0.66 (0.55-0.77) | 0.72 (0.63-0.81) | | | | | Ramaekers | 0.69 (0.58-0.80) | 0.86 (0.80-0.92) | 0.69 (0.58-0.79) | 0.76 (0.68-0.85) | | | | | CNUH-5 | 0.59 (0.50-0.69) | 0.59 (0.48-0.70) | 0.58 (0.49-0.67) | 0.61 (0.54-0.69) | | | | |
|
|
Data are presented as areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve and 95% confidence intervals; values are from the DeLong et al. test. |