Comparison of Risk Scores for Predicting Adverse Outcomes in Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Table 2

Performance of different risk scores in comparison with the Oakland score in the prediction of adverse outcomes.

	Rebleeding	Blood transfusion	Hemostatic intervention	Any adverse outcome
	(25.2%)	(18.7%)	(28.5%)	(47.2%)
Oakland	0.67 (0.56-0.78)	0.97 (0.94-0.99)	0.66 (0.55-0.78)	0.78 (0.70-0.87)
Birmingham	0.60 (0.48-0.72)	0.93 (0.89-0.97)	0.70 (0.59-0.80)	0.74 (0.65-0.83)
	SALGIB	0.64 (0.52-0.76)	0.95 (0.91-0.99)	0.71 (0.61-0.81)	0.78 (0.70-0.86)
SHA2PE		0.68 (0.57-0.78)	0.84 (0.78-0.91)	0.66 (0.55-0.77)	0.72 (0.63-0.81)
	Ramaekers	0.69 (0.58-0.80)	0.86 (0.80-0.92)	0.69 (0.58-0.79)	0.76 (0.68-0.85)
CNUH-5		0.59 (0.50-0.69)	0.59 (0.48-0.70)	0.58 (0.49-0.67)	0.61 (0.54-0.69)

Data are presented as areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve and 95% confidence intervals; values are from the DeLong et al. test.