Research Article

Impact of Occlusion Masks on Gender Classification from Iris Texture

Table 1

Summary of works on gender classification from iris.

CitationYearSpectrumImage typeOcclusion masksBest accuracy (%)

[1]2015NIRNormalized91.33
[35]2015NIRNormalized89.74
[30]2016NIRNormalized91.00
[9]2016NIRBoth69 Normalized, 85.7 periocular
[15]2017NIRPeriocular83.17
[10]2017NIR/VISPeriocular89.59
[16]2017VISPeriocular90.20
[31]2017NIRNormalized84.66
[14]2017NIRBoth66 Normalized, 80 periocular
[17]2018VISPeriocular90.00
[18]2018NIRPeriocular87.26
[11]2018NIRPeriocular85.93
[12]2018NIRPeriocular85.90
[19]2019NIRPeriocular85.40
[32]2019NIRNormalized95.45
[4]2019NIRBoth63.40 Normalized, 80.80 periocular
[20]2019NIRPeriocular94.63
[21]2019NIR/VISPeriocular86.89
[22]2019NIR/VISPeriocular91.90
[23]2019NIRPeriocular91.90
[36]2019NIRNormalized94.66
[24]2019VISPeriocular90.15
[25]2019NIRBoth66.67 Normalized, 93.34 face
[26]2020VISPeriocular92.00
[27]2020NIR/VISPeriocular81.59
[37]2020NIRNormalized96.00
[38]2021VISPeriocular75.10
[39]2021NIR/VISPeriocular75.72
[40]2023NIRBoth98.92 Normalized, 73.96 periocular
[41]2023VISPeriocular98.71

Works that do not use the NIR spectrum have not been thoroughly included. Image type “Both” means experiments were performed with normalized and periocular images.