Review Article

Indications for Dental Specialists for Treating Obstructive Sleep Apnea with Mandibular Advancement Devices: A Narrative Review

Table 1

Characteristics of the included primary studies.

Author/year/study type/countrySampleAgeType of applianceOSA severity a T0MeasurmentsPeriodResults

Aarab, 2010, RCT, Netherlands20 patients49.5 ± 8.1MAD, set at a constant vertical dimension with 0%, 25%, 50%, and 75% of the maximum protrusion21.6 ± 11.1 AHIPSG, ESS39 weeksThe AHI values in the 50% and 75% positions were significantly lower than those in the 25% position

Aarab, 2011, RCT, Netherlands64 patients: 21 MAD, 22 CPAP, 21 placebo50.4 ± 8.9MAD and CPAP21.4 ± 11.0 AHIPSG18 monthsDiscomfort in wearing, tenderness in the masseter muscle region upon awakening, and feeling of a changed occlusion upon awakening

Aarab, 2011, RCT, Netherlands57 patients: MAD (n = 20) nCPAP (n = 18) Placebo (n = 19)50.3 ± 9.1MAD and nCPAP22.1 ± 10.8 AHIPSG6 monthsMAD is effective in the supine position

Almeida, 2013, clinical trial, Canada22 patients53.8 ± 12.1MAD and CPAP30.7 ± 23.1 AHIPSG, ESS, SAQLI3 monthsA combination of therapies (MAD and CPAP) allows greater flexibility of treatment and opportunity for ongoing adherence in circumstances where CPAP cannot be used

Barnes, 2004, RCT, Australia104 patients47.0 ± 0.9MAD, CPAP, and placebo21.3 ± 1.3 AHIPSG, neurobehavioral testing, 24-hr ambulatory blood pressure, and echocardiography, maintenance of wakefulness test, Stanford Sleepiness Scale, ESS11 months77% of subjects achieved at least 70% of the maximum possible protrusion. With this degree of protrusion, 56.1% subjects achieved a reduction in the AHI of at least five events per hour

Benoist, 2017, RCT, Netherlands99 patients: 51 MAD, 48 SPT49.2 ± 10.2MAD and SPT11.7 (9.0–16.2) AHIPSG, ESS, FOSQ3 monthsThe SPT and MAD were equally effective in reducing the AHI and ODI in POSA patients
For patients using SPT, the AHI will likely decrease in all sleeping positions when MAD is added

Berg, 2020, RCT, Norway104 patients: 55 CPAP, 49 MAD49.6 (9.0)MAD and CPAP16.3 (12.4–23.0) AHISF36, PSQI, PSG12 monthsSeven (14.3%) in the MAD treatment group had quit treatment, all reporting not being compliant to treatment

Bishop, 2014, RCT, USA24 patients47.4 ± 2.6Klearway and TAP319.3 ± 4.6 AHIESS, SAQLI, RSR3 monthsAge negatively influences a patient’s ability or willingness to adapt to an intraoral appliance
Neither appliance proved to be more effective than the other in any AHI classification for any variable recorded

Blanco, 2005, RCT, Spain24 patients: 12 advanced, 12 control55.6 ± 11.8 advanced, 53.0 ± 12.7 controlTwo models of MAD with 5 mm were applied, one model with an advance of 75% and one without33.8 (14.7) AHI advanced, 24.0 (12.2) AHI controlPSG, ESS, SF-36, FOSQ3 monthsPatients in the advanced group presented a decrease in the number of apneas in the supine position, suggesting that the device could be particularly effective in cases of position-dependent OSA
The group treated with the MAD, which advances the mandible, presented a greater reduction, and more than half of the patients in this group achieved complete control of OSA symptoms

Bloch, 2000, RCT, Switzerland24 patients50.6 ± 1.5Monoblock, Herbst26.7 ± 3.3 AHIESS, PSG5 monthsThe AHI during treatment with the OSA-Herbst device but not with the OSA-Monobloc device was significantly correlated with the baseline AHI
Both IOAs improved sleep-disordered breathing and measured snoring. These effects were even more pronounced for the OSA-Monobloc than for the OSA-Herbst device, but the differences were not significant
Seven patients complained of temporomandibular joint pain, four of muscle discomfort, and three of dental discomfort. The prevalences of these side effects were identical for the OSA-Herbst and OSA-Monobloc appliances

Brown, 2021, CT, Australia105 patients45 ± 12MAD30 ± 19 AHIPSG, MRI3 monthsParticipants without PMR tendon had greater mandibular advancement, greater anteroposterior airway diameter increase, and increased odds of complete response in those who tolerated treatment
About 7% of participants overall were unable to acclimatize to MAS because of ongoing pain, jaw locking, or other and withdrew, the majority of these being PMR tendon absent

Campbell, 2009, RCT, New Zeland28 patients: 12 objective advancement, 16 subjective49.8 ± 12.6 objective, 48.1 ± 10.6 subjectiveMAD26.5 ± 12.0 AHI objective, 25.4 ± 7.4 AHI subjectivePSG, ESS, questionnaires6 weeksThere were no significant differences in BMI, neck circumference, and baseline AHI between the “success” subjects with a complete response to treatment and the poor responders in the treatment failure category
Neither titration method (self-titration or fixed at 70% protrusion) was significantly superior

Chan, 2010, CT, Australia69 patients50.5 ± 10.1MAD27.0 ± 14.7 AHIPSG, MRI8 weeksThere were no significant differences between responders and nonresponders with respect to age, gender, or BMI

Chan, 2010, CT, Australia35 patients53.7 ± 11.9 responders, 55.8 ± 10.1 nonrespondersMAD29.3 ± 15.7AHI responders, 24.1 ± 11.2 AHI nonrespondersPSG, nasopharyngoscopy6–8 weeksThere were no significant differences between responders and nonresponders with respect to age, sex, body mass index, or baseline AHI. An increase in the velopharyngeal cross-sectional area with mandibular advancement was significantly associated with a treatment response on polysomnography

Chen, 2008, CT, China70 patients50.0 ± 9.6MAD0.0–68.0 RDIDental model analysis system7 years 4 monthsThe study provides evidence of significant occlusal changes, but none of the 70 patients stopped OA treatment because of this

Chen, 2019, CT, Netherlands64 patients58 (48.5, 67) responders, 59.0 (48.3, 64.8) nonrespondersMAD22.2 (15.5, 30.4) AHI responders, 26.9 (14.3, 39.6) AHI nonrespondersCBCT, PSG6 weeksBody mass index (BMI) was significantly smaller at baseline in the responders than in the nonresponders. Neck circumference (NC) of the OSA patients was also significantly smaller at baseline in the responders than in the nonresponders

Dal-Fabbro, 2014, RCT, Brazil39 patients47.0 ± 8.9Placebo, MAD, CPAP.42.3 ± 4.5 AHIPSG, ESS6 monthsSupine and nonsupine AH events both improved with CPAP and MAD, with the first one which had a stronger effect

De Almeida, 2002, CT, Brazil7 patients47.4MAD13.20 AHIPSG, MRI9 monthsOne patient had an anterior displacement with reduction, and two patients had anterior displacement without reduction. In the other two patients, osteophytes were seen in both joints

De Britto-Teixeira, 2013, RCT, Brazil19 patients48.6 (9.6)Placebo and Twin Block16.3 ± 7.2 AHIPSG10 monthsThe use of TB produced a reduction in AHI from 16.3 (SD = 7.2) to 11.7 (SD = 9.4). The use of WRAP (placebo) yielded an increase in AHI from 16.3 (SD = 7.2) to 19.6 (SD = 14.8)

De Corso, 2015, CT, Italia65 patients44.26MAD21.4 ± 6 AHIDISE, ESS, Berlin3 monthsThe presence of an anteroposterior pattern of closure and absence of the latero-lateral one at the level of the palate, as documented during pretreatment DISE, are associated with therapeutic success in mild/moderate OSA patients treated with custom-made MADs

De Ruiter, 2018, RCT, Netherlands99 patients49.2 ± 10.2MAD and SPT11.7 (9.0–16.2) AHIPSG, position sensor, FOSQ-30, ESS12 monthsSupine AHI decreased to a similar extent in the two groups
The most common adverse events in both groups were persistent snoring and persistent tiredness. Tooth pain, temporomandibular dysfunction, and open bite

Deane, 2009, RCT, Australia27 patients49.4 ± 11.0MAD and TSD27.0 ± 17.2 AHIPSG, questionnaries, ESS12 weeksAnalysis of the effect of the appliances on AHI in supine and other body positions during sleep demonstrated that AHI between baseline and MAD was significantly different

Dieltjens, 2015, RCT, Belgium20 patients52.5 ± 10.5MAD and SPT24.6 ± 10.2 AHIPSG, questionnaires6 monthsMAD therapy was effective in reducing both supine AHI and non-supine AHI when compared to baseline
A combination of SPT + MAD therapy further reduces the sleep apnea severity when compared to the individual treatment modalities

Doff, 2010, RCT, Netherlands103 patients: 51 MAD, 52 CPAP.49 ± 10MAD and CPAP39 ± 31 AHIPSG, lateral cephalogram2 yearsMainly dental changes in the craniofacial morphology in the MAD group compared with the CPAP group following 2 years of treatment

Doff, 2012, CT, Netherlands103 patients: 51 MAD, 52 CPAP.49 ± 10MAD and CPAP39 ± 31 AHIPSG, dental models in articulator2 yearsA decrease in overjet, overbite, number of occlusal contact points, and a different anterior–posterior relationship are dental changes most likely to occur

Doff, 2012, CT, Netherlands103 patients: 51 MAD, 52 CPAP.49 ± 10MAD and CPAP39 ± 31 AHIMandibular function and impairment questionnaire (MFIQ), function impairment rating scale (FIRS), questionary, PSG2 yearsThe occurrence of (pain-related) TMDs increases in the initial period of MAD therapy but tends to return to baseline values during a 2-year follow-up

Doff, 2013, RCT, Netherlands103 patients: 51 MAD, 52 CPAP49 ± 10MAD and CPAP39 ± 31 AHIPSG, ESS, FOSQ, SF-362 yearsOlder, obese, and with predominantly severe OSAS patients switched from MAD therapy to CPAP therapy
Tooth pain, temporomandibular joint pain, myofascial pain, dry mouth, and excessive salivation. Long-term oral appliance therapy and CPAP may result in dental changes in patients with OSAS

Edwards, 2016, RCT, USA14 patients51.8 ± 2.3MAD29.6 ± 5.3 AHITwo PSG (clinical and research), with and without OA1 weekBaseline anatomy/collapsibility (i.e., Vpassive) and loop gain were independent predictors of patients likely to gain the greatest benefit from MAD therapy. Trend for responders to have more severe OSA without their devi

El-Sohl, 2011, CT, USA10 patients56.9 ± 6.1Auto-CPAP, MAD23.5 ± 13.4 AHIPSG, ESS3 daysThe combination therapy was successful in reducing optimal CPAP pressure and normalizing AHI in selected patients with OSA
Two patients noted a feeling of pressure in the face, and one patient complained of early morning, non-persisting discomfort in the mouth and temporomandibular joint

Engleman, 2002, RCT, United Kingdom51 patients46 ± 9MAD and CPAP31 ± 26 AHIQuestionnaires, home sleep monitoring4 monthsCPAP preference with higher body mass index

Fleury, 2004, CT, France40 patients.57 ± 9MAD46 ± 21 AHIPSG, questionnaires, ESS, VAS18 monthsAt the first assessment, which was performed at 80% of MMA, only four patients presented sufficient clinical and oximetric improvement to allow polysomnography. These four patients were in the success group. For the remaining 36 patients, advancement was continued beyond the initial advancement. 25% of advancements were motivated by abnormal ODI, despite the resolution of the symptoms
For all of the patients in groups (dental class of Angle) 2 and 3, mandibular advancement had to be stopped due to temporomandibular discomfort

Fransson 2002, CT, Sweden65 patients54.8 ± 9.0MAD14.0 ODICephalogram, PSG2 yearsThe SNB angle decreased significantly, because of posterior rotation of the mandible and a significant increase in anterior face height. We found lower incisors to be proclined after 2 year

Fransson, 2022, RCT, Sweden314 patients55 (49;65) non-POSA and 54 (47;63) POSAMonobloc and bibloc29 (17;39) AHI non-POSA, 23 (14;30) AHI POSANight at-home polygraphic study, ESS, PGIC1 yearThe subgroup of subjects with severe OSA at baseline showed the greatest improvements in AHI. The decrease in supine AHI was significantly greater among subjects with POSA, whereas the decrease in nonsupine AHI was significantly greater in the non-POSA group
The original efficacy studies showed equivalent efficacy of the 2 types of appliances, so they were analyzed together in this study. Advance the mandible to 75% of maximal capacity or by at least 5 mm

Friedman, 2010, CT, USA87 patients45.70 ± 11.47Two nontitratable one-piece MAD and a titratable two-piece device39.96 ± 23.70 AHIESS, PSG, VAS2 monthsPatients in the study with prior surgery did not fare better than those naïve to surgery

Garcia-Campos, 2016, CT, Mexico30 patients49.7 ± 12.45MAD22.45 ± 6.14/hr AHIESS, questionnaires, PSG3 monthsThe most commonly found side effect was excessive drooling, which lasted for about a month and then disappeared with no treatment. The second most frequent side effect was dental pain, which was also self-limited. Four patients reported no side effects

Gauthier, 2009, RCT, Canada23 patients47.9 ± 1.6Two MADs9.4 ± 1.1 RDIPSG, FSS, ESS, FOSQ, questionnaires2 yearsThe RDI was also reduced by both MAA with no difference between appliances in the supine position or in non-REM sleep
Both appliances had 4 mm advancement, but the silencer was statistically more efficient at reducing the RDI

Geoghegan, 2015, RCT, China45 patients52Bibloc and monobloc MADs21.1 (14.2–50.1) AHILateral cephalogram, PSG, ESS26 weeksBoth MADs resulted in similar significant cephalometric changes around the hyoid bone position and soft palate length
After treatment, there was a highly significant reduction in AHI with the monoblock and with the twin block. The monoblock demonstrated a significantly better result than the twin block
Changes were seen in several other measurements (SNB, mandibular plane angle, overjet, overbite, and face height) with both MADs

Ghazal, 2009, RCT, Germany103 patients: 51 IST, 52 TAP55.5 ± 10.6Two MADs32 ± 6 AHI IST, 37 ± 8 AHI TAPPSG, ESS, PSQI, questionnaires2 years51% of the patients with the IST and 79.2% with the TAP demonstrated complete treatment success

Gogou, 2022, CT, Greece50 patients: 34 DISE, 16 control48.8 ± 12,3MAD31.7 ± 17.3 AHIDISE, PSG, questionnaires8 weeksAn increase of upper-airway dimensions during mandibular advancement during DISE may have predictive value regarding the likelihood of successful treatment with a MAD
By using DISE, the full short-term efficacy of MAD treatment was achieved with less initial mandibular protrusion than in the control group

Gotsopoulos, 2002, RCT, Australia73 patients48 ± 11MAD, control device27.1 ± 15.3 RDIESS, questionnaire, PSG10 weeksThe MAD produced a 52% reduction in mean RDI and a significantly higher mean minimum arterial oxygen saturation (MinSao2) compared with the control device
A significantly higher proportion of patients experienced side effects with the MAD than with the control device, namely, jaw discomfort, tooth tenderness, and excessive salivation

Huang, 2023, RCT, China60 POSA patients: 20 SPT, 20 MAD, 20 combined39.20 ± 10.92 SPT, 41.55 ± 11.79 MAD, 40.75 ± 10.51 SOTSPT, MAD19.21 (11.77–23.90) AHI SPT, 18.58 (16.10–24.55) AHI MAD, 14.85 (11.93–26.59) AHI SOTPSG, ESS, QSQ6 monthsAfter 3 and 12 months of follow-up, MAD and SPT have comparable effects on improvements in the AHI and compliance in subjects with mild-to-moderate POSA
Treatment with both SPT plus MAD can combine the advantages of the two methods and achieve complementary results

Isacsson 2019, RCT, Sweden302 patients: 146 bibloc, 156 monobloc54 (12.2) bibloc, 55 (11.4) monoblocBibloc and monobloc MADs27 (14.2) AHI bibloc, 25 (14.1) AHI monoblocPSG, ESS, FOSQ2 monthsThe effect of reducing AHI was significantly equivalent between the two appliances

Ishiyama, 2017, RCT, Japan25 patients. 13 jaw exercises, 12 placebo51.4 ± 9.7MAD21.5 ± 10.0 AHIPSG, questionnaires, ESS, PSQI, VAS3 monthsArthralgia at the 1-month evaluation. Disc displacement developed in one subject in the JE-group at the 2-week and 1-month evaluations and in two or three subjects in the PE-group across evaluation periods. Chewing pain and jaw-opening pain in the morning at the 1-month evaluation

Jo, 2018, CT, Korea79 patients44.7 ± 13.1MAD17.3 ± 5.6 AHIQuestionnaires, DISE2 yearsThis study revealed that the degree of obstruction at the levels of the velum and epiglottis were significantly decreased after long-term oral appliance therapy

Johal, 2007, CT, UK50 patients51.1 (7.1)MAD17.3 (5–30) AHIESS, PSG, EMG8 weeksA highly significant increase in the EMG activity was observed in two upper airway dilatory muscles and a muscle of mastication, following the placement of MAS in awake OSA patients

Johal, 2017, RCT, United Kingdom25 patients44.9 (SD 11.5)Ready-made and custom-made MADs13.3 (10.9–25) AHIVisi-Lab Greyflash at home, ESS, FOSQ, SF-36, OAOQ7 monthsThe MRDc resulted in a statistically significant difference in terms of total treatment success (96%; n = 24). The MRDr resulted in a total treatment success of 64% (n = 16)

Johnston, 2002, RCT, Northern Ireland21 patients55.10 ± 6.87MAD, placebo31.93 ± 21.18 AHI MAD; 30.69 ± 18.82 AHI placeboESS, questionnaires, Edentrace II12 weeksMAD was significantly more effective than the placebo in improving the outcome measures
The most commonly reported complication was excessive salivation when wearing the appliance. Some subjects reported temporary occlusal changes in the morning. Temporary TMJ discomfort on waking was common

Kato, 2000, RCT, Japan37 patients49.0 (27.1–66.6)Three MADs with 2-, 4-, and 6-mm mandibular advancements26.0 (11.2 to 72.0) ODIEndoscopy, oximetry1 weekObese patients with severe nocturnal desaturation may not be appropriate candidates for MAD therapy. The presence of severe OP and hypopharyngeal narrowing may be an alternative explanation for the poor responses to the MADs
Step-advancement of mandibular position resulted in a dose-dependent reduction of closing pressure of the passive pharynx, (2) successful improvement of nocturnal oxygenation appeared to be achieved when the MAD reduced the closing pressure of the passive pharynx below atmospheric pressure, and (3) each 2-mm mandibular advancement coincided with approximate 20% improvement of the number and severity of nocturnal desaturations
Excessive salivation and transient discomfort or pain of the temporomandibular joint for a brief time after awakening were commonly reported

Kazemeini, 2022, RCT, Belgium10 patients48.0; 41.5; 55.6MAD with subjective, objective PSG titration and DISE titration21.3; 17.5; 26.8 AHIPSG, DISE4 monthsComparable amounts of titration and corresponding efficacy in terms of AHI reduction and reduction in subjective symptoms were found among the three titration methods. In titrationSubj, the relief of subjective complaints may lead to premature interruption of the titration and a suboptimal treatment outcome. On the other hand, objective titration may induce discomfort at the start of MAD treatment, therefore possibly making habituation more difficult

La Mantia, 2018, RCT, Italy40 patients49.6 ± 11.6 AB, 47.5 ± 10.2 BABibloc and monobloc MADs28.5 ± 5.7 AHIPSG, ESS, SAQLI22 weeksUse of the monoblock MAD should be considered when patients with OSAS choose MAD treatment, as it was more efficient in improving objective OSAS parameters compared to twinblock MAD

Lai, 2019, CT, Australia22 patients49 ± 12MAD and EPAP15 (10,34) AHIPSG6 weeksThe addition of oral and oral plus nasal EPAP valves to a novel MAS device resulted in stepwise reductions in OSA severity

Lai, 2022, CT, China105 patients: 65 with retrognathia (33 CPAP, 32 MAD), 40 no (20 CPAP, 20 MAD)46.72 + 10.19 with, 46.78 + 11.37 withoutMAD and CPAP37–38 mean AHIPSG, cephalometry, questionnaires12 monthsMandibular advancement device treatment of severe OSA patients with mandibular retrognathia is superior to that of severe OSA without mandibular retrognathia in terms of AHI and ODI

Lawton, 2005, RCT, UK16 patients44.8 (range 24.0–68.4)Twin block, Herbst45.5 (29.0–68.0) AHIQuestionnaires, domiciliar sleep study, ESS, SF-36, VAS14 weeksThere was no significant difference in the median AHI scores produced by treatment with the Herbst (24.5, n = 16) and TB (34.0, n = 15) appliances
With Herbs appliance, muscular discomfort was experienced by 56% initially, but this improved to 25% after 4 6 weeks. With the TB, there was a reduction from 50% to 19%. Initial TMJ discomfort improved from 69% to 31% and 38%–19%, respectively, for the Herbst and TB appliances. An abnormal bite was experienced initially by 69% of Herbst and 38% of TB, and they reduced to 56 and 21. Dry mouth from 63 to 56 with Herbst and 75–63 with TB. Excessive salivation 31–19 for Herbst and 44–31 for TB

Ma, 2020, CT, China42 patients41.5 ± 9.0MAD23.4 ± 11.5 AHIRhinospirometry, rhinomanometry, magnetic resonance imaging, home sleep testing, and PSG baseline1 yearIt was found that the dose-dependent relationship between AHI reduction and mandibular protrusion was nonlinear, and the overall success and normalization rate entered a relative plateau stage after approximately 70% MMP

Makihara, 2022, RCT, Japan32 patients: 17 50%, 15 75%62.2 ± 1.90MAD 50% and 75% of maximum mandibular protrusion22.3 ± 13.49 AHIESS, PSG4 monthsEffective treatment across both mandibular advancement groups was more often documented in females compared to males
While treatment success rates were higher with 50% mandibular advancement compared to 75% mandibular advancement, this difference was not statistically significant in patients with mild to moderate OSA

Marco-Pitarch, 2018, CT, Spain41 patients54.5 ± 10.3MAD22.5 ± 16.8 AHIESS, PSG, VAS6 monthsThe higher the SaO2 Min. initial value, the smaller the improvement produced by MAD, and the larger the arousal index initial value, the larger the improvement after placement of the oral appliance. Only gender and Fujita index were statistically significant

Marklund, 1998, CT, Sweden26 patients: 12 Posa, 14 non-POSA59 POSA, 54 non-POSAMAD41 (range, 16–70) AHIPSG2 monthsThis study demonstrates that supine-dependent sleep apnea is a strong predictor of successful treatment with the MAD in patients with obstructive sleep apnea

Marklund, 2004, CT, Sweden619 patients: 160 snoring, 459 OSA51 men (range, 25–74). 55 women (range, 30–75)MAD16 (range, 0.0–76) AHIPSG2 yearsWomen with sleep apnea were more likely than men with sleep apnea to have treatment success with the mandibular advancement device. Supine-dependent sleep apneas, mild disease, and an increase in mandibular advancement predicted treatment success among the men, while mild sleep apnea was associated with treatment success in the women
Discomfort, including excessive salivation or a feeling of awkwardness when wearing the device, was the main cause of the poor tolerability of the device. Insufficient effects on snoring or odontologic problems, i.e., symptoms from the craniomandibular system, periodontal disease, or changes in occlusion during treatment, were other explanations for a failure to accept the device

Marklund, 2015, RCT, Sweden91 patients: 45 MAD, 46 placebo49.8 (10.6) MAD, 54.1 (9.4) PlaceboMAD15.6 (9.8) AHI MAD, 15.3 (10.5) AHI placeboESS, KSS, OSLER, SF-36, FOSQ, PSG4 monthsIt was observed that patients using a MAD slept more in the supine position than in nonsupine positions, indicating that the effect of an oral appliance in reducing sleep apneas was even more effective than the results of the AHI revealed
The AHI was 6.7 (SD, 4.9) for the MAD group, which was significantly lower than in patients using the placebo device (16.7 (SD, 10.0)); Snoring appeared less than once a week during treatment with the oral appliance, which was less than with the placebo device
Jaw pain, tooth pain, hypersalivation, and bite changes. Adverse effects were more common with MAD than with the placebo device

Marklund, 2016, RCT, Sweden9 patients68.1 (60.0–76.3)MAD17.3 (IQR 9.7–26.5) AHIPSG, ESS16.5 yearsBoth the overjet and the overbite decreased significantly during treatment with OA. Deteriorations in OSA severity and a loss of OA efficacy were found in the present small sample of patients treated continuously for more than 15 years with this method

Mehta, 2001, RCT, Australia28 patients48 ± 6.9MAD, control oral plate27 ± 17 AHIPSG, questionnaires, ESS, cephalometric radiographs4 weeksAHI with the MAD is positively correlated with neck circumference and baseline AHI and negatively correlated with the width of the retropalatal airway and angulation of the mandibular plane to the anterior cranial base

Mosca, 2022, CT, Canada58 patients51.6 ± 8.0 (28–70)MAD31.4 ± 23.0 (10.0–105.3) AHIHome sleep test, AI, and heuristic prediction method3 nights/6 monthsIrritation to teeth, jaw, or gums; dryness; excessive salivation; and sleep disturbance as a result of OAT. The percentage of participants who reported experiencing bite changes as a result of OAT was 27.3

Mostafiz, 2011, CT, Australia53 patients49.5 ± 11.8MAD33.014.4 AHILateral cephalogram2 monthsTreatment nonresponders were significantly older with more severe OSA than complete responders. Maxillary length and upper-facial height were significantly shorter in complete responders than in partial responders. BMI, tongue area, oral area, and tongue/oral CSA ratio were considered as independent variables for predicting %AHI using multiple linear regression

Neill, 2002, RCT, New Zeeland19 patients47.7 ± 10.1Two MADs22.2 ± 19.8 (SD) RDIPSG, questionnaires6 weeksThe mean mandibular protrusion in eleven subjects was 61.5% of the maximum, which was lower than ideal and may have reduced the success of this treatment. However, we found no relationship between the degree of advancement and measures of OSAS improvement

Ng, 2006, CT, Australia12 patients51 ± 9MAD22.0 ± 2.6 AHIPSG, nose mask, nasendoscopy8 weeksPatients with oropharyngeal closure were significantly more likely to have complete responses with MAD therapy than were patients with velopharyngeal closure. The AHI supine reduced

Nikopolou, 2020, RCT, Netherlands57 patients: 20 MAD patients, 18 nCPAP patients, and 19 placebo52. 0 ± 9.6MAD, CPAP, placebo21.4 ± 11.0 AHI MAD; 20.1 ± 9.0 AHI CPAP; 19.5 ± 8.4 AHI placeboMFIQ, FIRS6 monthsLow frequency of clinical signs of TMD pain in mild to severe OSA patients
Clinical signs of temporomandibular disorders who also expressed a desire for treatment of their TMD complaints, an unhealthy periodontium (periodontal pockets >5 mm), dental pain, and/or inadequate retention possibilities for an intraoral appliance were excluded as well

Niżankowska-Jędrzejczy, 2014, CT, Poland38 patients: 22 OSAS MAD, 16 control52.50 ± 8.33 OSA, 54.06 ± 12.09 controlMAD24.00 (15.70–31.25) AHIPSG, blood samples6 monthsSupine AHI significantly decreased from 36.50 to 15 and 12 at 3 and 6-month follow-up

Op De Beeck, 2019, CT, Belgium100 patients47.6 ± 10.0MAD21.0 ± 11.2 AHIPSG, DISE3 monthsThe presence of tongue base collapse during baseline DISE examination is strongly correlated to favorable MAD response in patients with OSA. Patients with complete concentric collapse at the level of the palate (CCCp) and/or complete laterolateral oropharyngeal collapse (CLLCop) during DISE tend to deteriorate under MAD treatment
Mild, temporary side effects, as is usual during the startup of any MAD treatment

Op De Beeck, 2021, CT, Belgium36 patients48.5 (45.8–51.1)MAD23.5 (19.7–29.8) AHIPSG, ESS, VAS3 monthsMAD responders were slightly younger than nonresponders. MAD treatment significantly improved AHI, supine AHI, and nonsupine AHI. A greater reduction in AHI was associated with lower loop gain, a higher arousal threshold, a lower response to arousal, moderate collapsibility, and weaker muscle compensation

Pepin, 2019, RCT, France198 patients: 100 TALI, 98 ONIRIS51 (SD, 12)Heat-molded and custom-made MADs26.6 SD 10.4 AHIESS, VAS, SF-12, PSG2 monthsAfter 2 months, both treatments significantly improved AHI per hour, and scores for SF-12 (both the physical and mental subscores), Pichot fatigue and depression scales, Epworth sleepiness scale, and snoring with no significant differences between the two MADs
The most frequently reported side effects were dental pain, temporomandibular joint pain, discomfort related to MAD volume in the mouth, muscular pain, and muscle aches. Excessive salivation and gag reflex were observed in the ONIRIS group

Perck, 2020, CT, Belgium100 patients47.6 ± 10.0MAD14.6 (9.3–24.0) AHINasopharyngoscopy, PSG3 monthsThe current study indicated a relationship between a prominent uvula (C-shaped palate) and a negative response to MAD treatment

Petri, 2008, RCT, Denmark93 patients: 33 MAD, 30 MNA, 30 placebo50 ± 11 MAD, 50 ± 10 MNA, 49 ± 10 placeboMAD, MNA, placebo39.1 ± 23.8 AHI MAD, 32.6 ± 22.0 AHI MNA, 34.3 ± 26.3 AHI placeboPSG, ESS, SF-36, QOL4 weeksMAD had a significant effect on AHI, calculated separately for the supine and nonsupine sleeping positions
AHI, Epworth score, and vitality in the MAD group differed significantly from that in the MNA group and no-intervention group
Two patients could not tolerate the appliance; one patient suffered loosening of the teeth, and one suffered pain of the temporomandibular joint

Petri, 2019, CT, Denmark62 patients51 (range 27–65)Custom-made, monobloc MAD34 (range 6–117) AHIPSG, cephalometry, acoustic reflectometry13 weeksPOSA is indicative for success, and nonsupine AHI is inversely related to success. Cephalometry was not predictive
Pitsis, 2002, RCT, Australia23 patients50 ± 10 (29–64)MAD-1 and MAD-2 with 4 and 14 interincisal opening21 ± 12 (6–47) AHIQuestionnaires, PSG, ESS2 monthsThe amount of vertical opening induced by the appliance does not have an impact on treatment efficacy to any great extent
Excessive salivation (48% versus 57%), dry mouth (26% versus 22%), tooth grinding (22% versus 13%), and gum irritation (22% versus 13%) between MAD-1 and MAD-2, there was a trend toward a greater proportion of patients reporting jaw discomfort with MAS-2 (48% versus 70%)

Quinnell, 2014, RCT, UK90 patients50.9 (11.6)Thermoplastic ‘boil and bite’ device, semi-bespoke device, and bespoke MAD13.8 (6.2) AHIPSG, ESS, FOSQ, SAQLI, SF-36, (EQ-5D-3 L)5 monthsThe response was significantly associated with baseline BMI and contemporaneous BMI. Baseline AHI, ESS, gender, age, and compliance were not associated with treatment response
Mouth problems/discomfort and excess salivation with SP2 performing best for both

Randerath, 2002, RCT, Germany20 patients56.5 ± 10.2CPAP, ISAD17.5 ± 7.7 AHIPSG3 monthsThe patients in whom effectiveness was demonstrated in the first ISAD application differed from nonresponders by their significantly younger age and heavier weight
Two patients noted a feeling of pressure in the mouth; eight patients complained of early morning, nonpersisting discomfort in the mouth and temporomandibular joint

Remmers, 2017, CT, Canada202 patients48.4 (26–70) part 2, 49.8 (24–76) part 1MAD25.5 (10.5–65.1) ODI part 1, 31.1 (10.3–74.6) ODI part 2In-home feedback mandibular positioner. Home PSGFour nightsSome participants reported having tooth and/or gum discomfort during the FCMP test

Ringqvist, 2003, RCT, Sweden67 patients: 30 MAD, 37 UPPP.48.9 (46.3–51.4) years MAD, 51.0 (49.1–52.9) years UPPPMAD, UPPP17.9 (2.9) AHI dental, 19.9 (3.0) AHI UPPPLateral cephalometry4 yearsThe vertical positions of the maxillary incisors (the distances incision superius (IS)-NSL and is-ML) and the mandibular incisors (the distance incision inferius (II)- NSL) changed significantly. The mandible rotated posteriorly (the mandibular plane angle increased by 0.5°). As a consequence of the posterior rotation of the mandible, the distances II-NSL and IS-ML increased

Rose, 2002, RCT, Germany26 patients56.8 ± 5.2Two MADs16.0 ± 4.4 RDIPSG, VAS, portable somnograph20 weeksBoth appliances investigated are effective in treating patients with mild OSA and can be used as an alternative treatment option. Concerning the RDI and AI, the nonretentive activator proved to be statistically more effective than the retentive Silencor® appliance
The initial side effects of the Silencor were higher salivation and complaints of pain in the gingiva and teeth. Side effects were more frequent with the activator; in addition to increased salivation, seven patients (30%) complained of pain in the TMJ and f tenderness in the masseter muscle

Sanner, 2002, CT, Germany15 patients57.2 ± 8.9MAD19.8 ± 14.5 AHIMRI, PSG, questionnaires4 weeksDental discomfort, xerostomia, excess salivation, bite change, and temporomandibular joint pain

Sari, 2011, CT, Turkey24 patients: 12 Klearway, 12 MAD39 ± 4.2KW and MAD18, 8 ± 7, 3 AHI KW, 17.9 ± 6.8 AHI MADPSG, ESS1 monthKlearway and MAD appliances are both effective in the treatment of mild and moderate OSA patients. An appliance (Klearway) that provides advancement of 85% of mandibular protrusion to open the upper airway was more effective in reducing the number of high apneic events during sleep than one (MAD), which provides 75%. Mandibular advancement device (MAD) should be preferred in mild OSA patients rather than moderate OSA patients
Mild pain in the TMJ and muscle tenderness. 25% of MAD had gum irritation (not in Kw, thanks to the thermoelastic material). 17% of KW had lower anterior tooth discomfort (due to increased retention) in the morning

Shi, 2023, RCT, Netherlands31 patients: 16 MAD-H and 15 MAD-S48.5 (±13.9)MAD-H (Herbst appliance); MAD-S (SomnoDent)16.6 (±6.7) /hr AHIESS, PSG, CBCT3 monthsThe AHI, AHI-nonsupine (not the AHI supine), and ODI reduced significantly with MAD in situ in the total group
Although the freedom of vertical opening is different between MAD-H and MAD-S, it seems that the respiratory outcomes were not affected by this design feature
Sensitive teeth and painful jaw muscles were 3–4 times more frequent in the MAD-H group compared to the MAD-S group, which might be due to the different design features. Painful temporomandibular complaints. 19% of MAD-H and 13% of MAD-S had changes in occlusion in the morning

Suga, 2014, CT, Japan20 patients: 7 rigid, 13 semi-rigid58.1 ± 7.6 rigid, 57.9 ± 11.4 semi-rigidRigid and semi-rigid MAD22.0 ± 13.8 AHI rigid, 20.5 ± 8.5AHI semi-rigidPSG, TC3 yearsNeither the change of the occlusion nor TMDs occurred in the both groups

Sutherland, 2014, RCT, Australia78 patients49.3 ± 11.1CPAP, MAD30.0 ± 12.7/hr AHIPSG3 monthsFor MAD response by definition 1 (MAD AHI <5/hr), only baseline AHI and age were significant predictors. In predicting MAD response by definition 2 (MAD AHI <10/hr), the combination of baseline AHI, age, and CPAP pressure was significant. By definition 3 of MAD response (≥50% AHI reduction), only age and neck circumference, but not CPAP pressure, had predictive value

Sutherland, 2016, CT, Australia35 patients53.7 ± 11.9 responders, 55.8 ± 10.1 nonrespondersMAD29.3 ± 15.7AHI responders, 24.1 ± 11.2 AHI nonrespondersPSG, nasopharyngoscopy6–8 weeksExcess upper airway soft tissue within the intramandibular space area, between gonion points and menton, is associated with a poor response to MAD treatment

Sutherland, 2018, CT, Australia142 patients56.3 ± 11.0MAD28.7 ± 17.5 AHIPSG, nasopharyngoscopy, spirometry, craniofacial photography4 monthsResponders tended to have a longer lower face, increased facial axis angle, and reduced maxillary and mandibular position angles, suggestive of maxillary/mandibular retrusion. We did not find any sex differences in the relationship between treatment response and any of the clinical or phenotypic predictors

Sutherland, 2018, CT, Australia80 patients57.6 ± 11.2MAD26.4 ± 15.4 AHINasopharyngoscopy, PSG15 weeksOur qualitative scoring system indicated a reduction in the level of collapse induced by the Müller maneuver with mandibular advancement. A stabilization of the airway with mandibular advancement would be expected

Svanholt, 2015, CT, Denmark27 patients52.6MAD10.6 and 111.7 (mean 39.1) AHILateral cephalogram4 weeksBMI was significantly smaller in the success treatment group compared with the no-success treatment group. OSA patients with retrognathia of the jaws responded successfully to MAD treatment, and the retrognathia of the maxilla was found to be the most important factor for the MAD treatment outcome

Tan, 2002, RCT, UK24 patients50.9 ± 10.1CPAP, MAD, MAD II22.2 ± 9.6 AHIPSG, questionnaires, ESS2 monthsInitial jaw discomfort early in the morning, but only one could not adapt to the device. There were no dental problems. Some degree of discomfort in the TMJ, facial musculature, or teeth on waking have been reported previously; these are normally mild and improve with time

Tegelberg, 2003, RCT, Sweden74 patients: 38 : 50% MAD; 36 : 75% MAD51.8 (49.0 ± 54.6) group 50–54.4 (52.4 ± 56.4) group 75MAD16.2 (2.9) AHI 50, 18.9 (4.7) group 75PSG1 yearNine patients in group 50 withdrew before the 1-year follow-up for the following reasons: 3 could not tolerate the dental appliance. Ten patients in group 75 withdrew before the 1-year follow-up for the following reasons: 1 could not tolerate the dental appliance, and 2 had TMJ pain on movements of the mandible

Tegelberg, 2020, RCT, Sweden302 patients: 146 bibloc, 156 monobloc55 (11.4) bibloc, 55 (10.7) monoblocBibloc and monobloc MADs25 (12.9) AHI bibloc, 23 (13.6) AHI monoblocPSG1 yearAlthough there was a greater reduction in the AHI in the bibloc group, the proportion of responders defined as having an AHI <10 at the 1-year follow-up was 68% in the bibloc group and 65% in the monobloc group
Treatment-related adverse events were generally mild and transient and occurred in 39% and 33% of bibloc and monoblock, respectively

Tong, 2020, RCT, Australia16 patients48 ± 11MAD and CPAP26 ± 13 AHIPSG12 weeksCombination therapy with CPAP and a novel MAD can normalize pharyngeal pressure swings and lower CPAP requirements by 40% compared with CPAP alone

Umemoto, 2019, CT, Japan52 patients: 23 twin-block, 29 fixed MAS52.9 ± 10.7 twin-block, 53.8 ± 8.6 fixedBibloc and monobloc MADs20.6 ± 11.5 AHI twin-block, 21.4 ± 15.2 AHI fixedPSG, ESS, cephalogram radiographs3 monthsSignificant improvements were observed in the AHI after using either the twin-block adjustable MAS allowing mouth opening or the fixed MAS, but the proportion of responders was significantly greater in the fixed group than in the twin-block group. In addition, the fixed group exhibited a significant improvement in the snoring index, arousal index, and desaturation rate
Patients with anodontia, severe malocclusion, severe periodontitis, or temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pain dysfunction syndrome were excluded

Uniken Venema, 2020, RCT, Netherlands103 patients: 51 MAD, 52 CPAP.61 ± 8 MAD, 59 ± 10 CPAPMAD and CPAP31.7 ± 20.6 AHI MAD, 49.2 ± 26.1 AHI CPAPPSG, ESS, FOSQ, Short Form Health Survey (RAND-36), and a questionnaire evaluating adherence10 yearsThe relapse in AHI could possibly be explained by a change in lifestyle, health status, or aging. With aging, there is an increase in pharyngeal closing pressure and upper airway resistance, due to a decrease in upper airway dilatator muscle strength

Van Den Bossche, 2022, CT, Belgium100 patients48.3 (10.0)MAD15.6 (10.4–23.5) AHIComputational fluid dynamics, DISE, nasendoscopy, PSG, CT3 monthsTongue base collapse during baseline is a positive predictor for successful MAD treatment for OSA. Furthermore, the presence of CCCp is an adverse DISE phenotype towards MAD treatment outcome
It is solely the presence of a prominent uvula (C-shaped position of the soft palate) during tidal breathing that remains strongly correlated with MAD treatment deterioration after multimodal labeling

Vanderveken 2008, RCT, Belgium35 patients49 ± 9Custom-made MAD, thermoplastic MAD13 ± 11 AHIPSG, VAS, ESS9 monthsA custom-made MAD is more efficacious than a prefabricated MAD made from thermoplastic material in the treatment of snoring and mild sleep apnea
No serious side effects were noted with either MAD

Vecchierini, 2019, CT, France312 patients: 77 women, 235 man57 women, 52 menMAD26.5 women, 30 men AHIPSG, questionnaires3–6 monthsThe treatment success rate was higher in women than in men, particularly in severe OSA. Complete response was also more common in women versus men across a range of AHI thresholds. Smaller neck circumference at baseline as a statistically significant independent predictor of MRD success in women. Treatment response in the severe OSA group was significantly better in women versus men. Decreases in AI and AHI were only independent predictors of treatment success and complete response in men
Women who experienced side effects were more likely to discontinue therapy than men. At least one side effect was reported by 55% of women and 49% of men. Mouth or temporomandibular joint pain was responsible for 60% of treatment discontinuations

Vroegop, 2013, CT, Belgium200 patients46 ± 9Custom-made simulation bite. A custom-made, titratable, duobloc MAD19 ± 13 AHIPSG, DISE, ESS, VAS3 monthsThe presence of palatal collapse at baseline evaluation was also associated with treatment response
Unable to tolerate the device throughout the night, choking sensations or side effects such as tooth tenderness and dry mouth, or a combination of thereof, and claustrophobia during MAD wear
The presence of hypopharyngeal collapse at baseline evaluation showed a tendency toward an association with a less favorable treatment outcome

Walker-Engstrom, 2002, RCT, Sweden72 patients: 32 dental appliances, 40 UPPP20–65MAD17.9 (2.9) AHI dental, 19.9 (3.0) AHI UPPPPSG4 yearsOne patient (3%) was not able to occlude his teeth in the same way as before treatment and reported TMJ pain on movement of the mandible.
(1) Five patients (15%) reported unilateral TMJ sounds (four patients reported clicking, and one patient reported crepitation). Three of these patients had reported these symptoms before treatment

Walker-Engstrom, 2003, RCT, Sweden77 patients: 40 MA 75% and 37 MA 50%50.4 (47.7–53.1) MA 75%, 54.3 (52.2–56.4) for the 50% MA groupMAD 50% and 75%47.0 (5.1) AHI MA 50%, 50.4 (4.7) AHI MA 75%PSG, ESS, questionnaires6 monthsThe patients who were normalized had a significantly lower mean value for BMI
The somnographic variables (AI, AHI, ODI, and SI) decreased significantly between baseline and the 6-month follow-up in both groups. No significant difference between the two groups
One patient (3%) in the 50% MA group was not able to occlude his teeth in the same way as before treatment. Five patients (12%) in the 75% MA group reported complaints of pain from the TMJ after an average time of 3 months (one resolved, four switched to MA 50%). Headache was significantly reduced after 6 months in the 75% MA group but not in the 50% MA group. In the 75% MA group, one patient could not tolerate the dental appliance. In the 50% MA group, five patients withdrew before the 6-month follow-up; two patients could not tolerate the dental appliance

Wang, 2015, CT, China42 patients47 ± 10MAD27 ± 19 AHIQuestionnaires, cephalometry, PSG4 yearsSkeletal changes, however, were predominantly induced by dental changes. Increases in lower and total anterior facial heights resulted from changes to the maxillary and mandibular incisors. Downward rotation of the mandible was caused by the retroclination of the maxillary incisors and the proclination of the mandibular incisors through incisal guidance, and lower and total anterior facial heights were thus increased

Wilhelmsson, 1999, RCT, Sweden95 patients: 49 dental, 46 UPPP49.3 (46.8–51.9) MAD, 51.0 (49.1–52.9) UPPPMAD18.2 (15.7–20.8) AHI MAD, 20.4 17.4–23.3 AHI UPPPPSG, questionnaires, pharyngoscopy, home sleep1 yearThe positive effect of the dental appliance was also independent of whether the predominant obstruction determined by FPMM was in the oropharynx, the hypopharynx, or both
Pain and tenderness from the temporomandibular joint were recorded at the 1-year follow-up

Yanamoto, 2021, RCT, Japan15 patients50.0 (31.5–69.0)Semi-fixed and fixed MAD12.5 (8.9–17.0) AHIPSG, a portable sleep test device10 weeksThere was no significant treatment difference in AHI, 3% ODI, and lowest SaO2 between the semi-fixed and fixed MAD
The fixed MAD resulted in a significantly higher incidence of TMJ pain compared to the semi-fixed MAD

Yang, 2015, RCT, China40 patients: 20 UPPP and 20 UPPP + MAD46.7MAD55.53 ± 5.61 AHIPSG, CT3 yearsThe combination of UPPP surgery and MAD therapy can further improve upper airway ventilation on the basis of OSAHS surgery, remitting airway obstruction symptoms, significantly reducing the recurrence rate, and improving the patient quality of life

Zhou, 2012, RCT, China16 patients45.23 years from 26.3 to 55.4Bibloc and monobloc MADs26.38 ± 4.13 AHIQuestionnaires, PSG, cephalometric radiography6 monthsBoth appliances manifested the potential to improve AHI, AI, and hypopnea index (HI), with a more statistically important improvement for AHI and AI in the case of the monoblock appliance

Articles included from review.