Research Article

Attention Mechanism with Spatial-Temporal Joint Deep Learning Model for the Forecasting of Short-Term Passenger Flow Distribution at the Railway Station

Table 3

Comparison of prediction performances obtained using different TGs in different baseline models.

Time granularity10 s20 s30 s60 s
IndicatorsRMSEMAEMAPE (%)RMSEMAEMAPE (%)RMSEMAEMAPERMSEMAEMAPE (%)

ARIMA16.28210.28155.143.06923.60258.763.22735.63663.2%120.97563.82988.1
BPNN3.9732.97514.18.8435.87718.514.8248.62723.9%44.44328.72526.6
CNN5.9613.23918.410.6048.68522.331.23814.61127.447.96125.61428.6
RNN5.6265.87913.89.3656.17418.330.96212.96223.9%46.71622.60623.6
LSTM5.2035.80813.78.7225.11417.528.80610.58923.9%31.32017.70122.4
ST-Bi-LSTM (no graph)2.9132.21412.77.0474.96117.214.8788.53423.3%29.49917.78221.7
ST-Bi-LSTM (1A)2.9272.02312.96.7444.29716.313.6968.75920.9%34.01522.68331.4
ST-Bi-LSTM (no A)2.8492.09412.66.6144.29115.913.2478.19120.1%25.46114.87419.4
ST-Bi-LSTM (no T)2.9312.14513.16.7614.30616.213.6008.3520.8%28.10316.91220.7
ST-Bi-LSTM (no T&A)2.9862.96613.56.6514.39516.513.8558.52720.2%30.21617.41122.1
Adam ST-Bi-LSTM2.8892.01813.06.6404.30916.213.3778.34619.7%26.51314.82119.4
ST-Bi-LSTM2.7161.92112.16.6054.28215.713.2158.12618.4%25.13315.03618.9