Review Article

A Review on the Recent Advances in Battery Development and Energy Storage Technologies

Table 1

Technology comparisons between various battery types [25, 26].

Battery typeAdvantagesDisadvantages

Flow battery(i) Independent energy and power rating(i) Medium energy (40–70 Wh/kg)
(ii) Long service life (10,000 cycles)
(iii) No degradation for deep charge
(iv) Negligible self-discharge

Lithium-ion(i) High energy density (80–190 Wh/kg)(i) Very high cost ($900–1300 kwh)
(ii) Very high efficiency 90–100%(ii) Short life cycle due to deep discharge
(iii) Low self-discharge (1–3% per month)(iii) Require special overcharge protection circuit

Lead acid(i) Low cost(i) Short cycle life (1200–1800 cycles)
(ii) Low self-discharge (2–5% per month)(ii) Cycle life affected by depth of charge
(iii) Low charge density (about 40 Wh/kg)

Nickel based(i) Can be fully charged (3000 cycles)(i) High cost ten times that of lead acid
(ii) High energy density (50–80 Wh/kg)(ii) High discharge (10% per month)

Sodium Sulphur (NaS)(i) High efficiency (85–92%)(i) Be heated in stand-by mode at 3250°C
(ii) High energy density (100 Wh/kg)
(iii) No degradation for deep discharge