Research Article
Network Traffic Anomaly Detection Model Based on Feature Reduction and Bidirectional LSTM Neural Network Optimization
Table 11
Detection results of the six models.
| Dataset | Model | Evaluation metrics | Accuracy (%) | Precision (%) | Recall (%) | F-score |
| NSL-KDD | HCRNNIDS | 84.46 | 82.15 | 92.14 | 86.86 | ADASYN-LightGBM | 86.25 | 82.97 | 94.05 | 88.16 | LNNLS-KH | 89.16 | 83.64 | 96.44 | 89.58 | STL-HDL | 91.02 | 82.35 | 94.98 | 88.21 | E-GraphSAGE | 90.20 | 83.92 | 96.03 | 89.57 | FR-APPSO-BiLSTM | 91.76 | 85.37 | 98.50 | 91.46 |
| UNSW-NB1 | HCRNNIDS | 88.28 | 85.92 | 92.43 | 89.06 | ADASYN-LightGBM | 89.36 | 90.27 | 91.44 | 90.85 | LNNLS-KH | 90.44 | 94.35 | 91.08 | 92.69 | STL-HDL | 90.29 | 92.19 | 96.14 | 94.12 | E-GraphSAGE | 91.42 | 93.46 | 94.43 | 93.94 | FR-APPSO-BiLSTM | 92.08 | 97.88 | 98.32 | 98.10 |
| CICIDS-2017 | HCRNNIDS | 85.90 | 94.34 | 90.44 | 92.35 | ADASYN-LightGBM | 92.00 | 97.30 | 95.44 | 96.36 | LNNLS-KH | 91.57 | 89.31 | 90.35 | 89.82 | STL-HDL | 90.46 | 95.03 | 93.23 | 94.12 | E-GraphSAGE | 93.26 | 92.35 | 94.51 | 93.41 | FR-APPSO-BiLSTM | 95.44 | 98.58 | 98.40 | 98.49 |
|
|