Abstract
We investigate some interesting properties of the -Euler polynomials. The purpose of this paper is to give some relationships between Bernstein and -Euler polynomials, which are derived by the -adic integral representation of the Bernstein polynomials associated with -Euler polynomials.
1. Introduction
Let be a fixed odd prime number. Throughout this paper , , and denote the ring of -adic integers, the field of -adic numbers, and the field of -adic completion of the algebraic closure of , respectively (see [1–15]). Let be the set of natural numbers and . The normalized -adic absolute value is defined by . As an indeterminate, we assume that with . Let be the space of uniformly differentiable function on . For , the -adic invariant integral on is defined by (see [7–10]). For , we can derive the following integral equation from (1.1): where (see [7–11]). As well-known definition, the Euler polynomials are given by the generating function as follows: (see [3, 5, 7–15]), with usual convention about replacing by . In the special case , are called the th Euler numbers. From (1.3), we can derive the following recurrence formula for Euler numbers: (see [12]), with usual convention about replacing by . By the definitions of Euler numbers and polynomials, we get (see [3, 5, 7–15]). Let denote the set of continuous functions on . For , Bernstein introduced the following well-known linear positive operator in the field of real numbers : where (see [1, 2, 7, 11, 12, 14]). Here, is called the Bernstein operator of order for . For , the Bernstein polynomials of degree are defined by In this paper, we study the properties of -Euler numbers and polynomials. From these properties, we investigate some identities on the -Euler numbers and polynomials. Finally, we give some relationships between Bernstein and -Euler polynomials, which are derived by the -adic integral representation of the Bernstein polynomials associated with -Euler polynomials.
2. -Euler Numbers and Polynomials
In this section, we assume that with . Let . From (1.1) and (1.2), we have Now, we define the -Euler numbers as follows: with the usual convention about replacing by .
By (2.2), we easily get with usual convention about replacing by .
We note that where is the th Frobenius-Euler numbers.
From (2.1), (2.2), and (2.4), we have Now, we consider the -Euler polynomials as follows: with the usual convention by .
From (1.2), (2.1), and (2.6), we get By comparing the coefficients on the both sides of (2.6) and (2.7), we get the following Witt's formula for the -Euler polynomials as follows: From (2.6) and (2.8), we can derive the following equation: By (2.6) and (2.9), we obtain the following reflection symmetric property for the -Euler polynomials.
Theorem 2.1. For , one has
From (2.5), (2.6), (2.7), and (2.8), we can derive the following equation: for , by using recurrence formula (2.3). Therefore, we obtain the following theorem.
Theorem 2.2. For , one has
By using (2.5) and (2.8), we get Therefore, we obtain the following theorem.
Theorem 2.3. For , one has
By using Theorem 2.3, we will study for the -adic integral representation on of the Bernstein polynomials associated with -Euler polynomials in Section 3.
3. Bernstein Polynomials Associated with -Euler Numbers and Polynomials
Now, we take the -adic integral on for the Bernstein polynomials in (1.7) as follows: By the definition of Bernstein polynomials, we see that Let with . Then, by (3.2), we get Thus, we obtain the following theorem.
Theorem 3.1. For with , one has
By (3.1) and Theorem 3.1, we get the following corollary.
Corollary 3.2. For with , one has
For with . Then, we get Therefore, we obtain the following theorem.
Theorem 3.3. For with , one has
By using binomial theorem, for , we get By comparing the coefficients on the both sides of (3.8) and Theorem 3.3, we obtain the following corollary.
Corollary 3.4. Let with . Then, we get
For , let , with . By induction, we get Therefore, we obtain the following theorem.
Theorem 3.5. Let . For with , one has
For by binomial theorem, we get
By using (3.13) and Theorem 3.5, we obtain the following corollary.
Corollary 3.6. Let . For with , one has