Effect of Tuber Size and Intra-Row Spacing on the Yield and Quality of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Varieties

Table 5

Interaction effects of variety, intra-row spacing, and tuber size on growth parameters of potato in 2013/2014 at Nono Benja.

Treatments			Growth parameters
Variety	Intra-row spacing (cm)	Tuber size (g)	Number of main stems	Plant height (cm)
Jalenie	20	20–35	2.21^uv	47.71^t
		36–50	2.69^st	47.43^t
		51–65	4.84^mn	48.90^t
		66–80	6.02^ghij	57.04^p-s
		81–95	6.40^g	63.79^jkl
	25	20–35	2.31^tuv	65.35^g-k
		36–50	3.33^pq	54.02^n-s
		51–65	4.79^mn	58.48^n-q
		66–80	8.38^c	74.08^bc
		81–95	8.19^c	63.44^jkl
	30	20–35	2.73^rst	48.06^t
		36–50	3.29^q	48.96^t
		51–65	5.08^lm	61.81^k-n
		66–80	7.52^ef	70.48^b-f
		81–95	8.09^cd	65.08^h-l
	35	20–35	3.23^q	54.63^qrs
		36–50	3.52^pq	46.54^t
		51–65	5.46^kl	57.75^o-r
		66–80	8.35^c	65.04^h-l
		81–95	9.10^b	58.40^n-q
	40	20–35	3.25^q	46.67^t
		36–50	4.11^o	48.21^t
		51–65	6.19^gh	56.31^p-s
		66–80	9.60^a	65.02^h-l
		81–95	9.79^a	56.94^p-s
Gudenie	20	20–35	2.27^tuv	56.73^p-s
		36–50	3.33^pq	64.27^h-l
		51–65	3.42^pq	67.33^e-j
		66–80	5.00^lmn	74.40^b
		81–95	4.60^n	71.83^bcd
	25	20–35	2.27^tuv	59.02^m-p
		36–50	3.50^pq	64.65^h-l
		51–65	3.79^op	64.13^i-l
		66–80	6.17^ghi	71.21^b-e
		81–95	5.69^jk	79.75^a
	30	20–35	2.64^stu	53.56^s
		36–50	3.29^q	69.25^d-g
		51–65	5.65^jk	68.23^d-h
		66–80	7.40^ef	79.09^a
		81–95	6.10^ghij	70.44^b-f
	35	20–35	2.17^v	66.69^fg
		36–50	3.17^qr	65.21^h-k
		51–65	5.44^kl	67.98^d-i
		66–80	7.15^f	80.38^a
		81–95	5.75^hijk	69.30^d-g
	40	20–35	2.42^tuv	62.54^klm
		36–50	3.11^qrs	61.17^l-o
		51–65	5.71^ijk	62.63^klm
		66–80	7.67^de	70.31^c-f
		81–95	6.06^ghij	70.19^c-f
SEM			0.17	1.47
CV (%)			5.95	4.17
LSD (5%)			0.47	4.13

Means with the same letter (s) within a column of a variable were not significantly different at . SEM = standard error mean, CV = coefficient of variation, and LSD = least significance difference.