Research Article

Effect of Tuber Size and Intra-Row Spacing on the Yield and Quality of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Varieties

Table 7

Interaction effects of variety, intra-row spacing, and tuber size on quality-related parameters of potato in 2013/2014 at Nono Benja.

TreatmentsQuality parameters
VarietyIntra-row spacing (cm)Tuber size (g)LT (t/ha)MT (t/ha)ST (t/ha)

Jalenie2020–354.77q3.06n-u3.82h-k
36–506.48g-o5.07g-k5.00c-f
51–656.40h-p5.22e-j4.96c-g
66–806.25h-p6.20b-h4.58d-i
81–957.32e-j4.24j-o8.59a
2520–356.16i-q3.33n-t5.16b-e
36–506.40h-p5.80d-i4.91c-g
51–656.06j-q6.97a-d5.42bcd
66–807.04f-m8.04a4.83c-g
81–957.35e-j6.25b-g5.88b
3020–355.56m-q4.82g-m4.21f-j
36–505.68k-q6.62a-e4.41e-j
51–655.97j-q6.66a-d5.61bc
66–8010.14a6.03c-h4.12g-j
81–955.13opq4.95g-l3.69jk
3520–355.41n-q3.70k-q4.28f-j
36–506.40h-p7.24abc4.68d-h
51–656.25h-p6.52b-f4.64d-h
66–807.42e-j6.90a-d5.61bc
81–955.59l-q5.15f-j4.12g-j
4020–356.24h-q7.04a-d4.62bc
36–504.96pq4.41i-n3.71ijk
51–655.03opq4.78h-m3.69jk
66–806.34h-p7.58ab4.65d-h
81–955.14opq4.80h-m3.81h-k

Gudenie2020–354.99pq1.49v2.11l
36–507.32e-j2.12s-v2.94kl
51–657.70d-h2.39p-v2.79l
66–807.07f-l2.29q-v2.80l
81–956.77g-n1.91tuv2.31l
2520–357.27e-j2.23r-v2.49l
36–506.23h-q1.69uv2.31l
51–659.51abc3.62l-r2.65l
66–8010.18a2.62p-v2.51l
81–957.00f-m2.23r-v2.45l
3020–357.27e-j2.38q-v2.76l
36–509.61abc3.13n-t2.38l
51–6510.00ab2.92o-v2.16l
66–806.90f-m2.03s-v2.18l
81–957.95d-g2.62p-v2.31l
3520–357.44e-j2.31q-v2.55l
36–507.58e-j2.31q-v2.23l
51–657.31e-j2.35q-v2.16l
66–809.10a-d3.02n-u2.66l
81–957.09f-k2.35q-v2.34l
4020–356.70g-n2.83o-v2.69l
36–507.18e-j2.81o-v2.39l
51–659.47abc3.82j-p2.44l
66–808.29c-f3.19n-t2.27l
81–958.61b-e3.39p-v2.69l

SEM0.530.520.31
CV (%)13.022.014.9
LSD (5%)1.471.460.87

Means with the same letter (s) in a column of a variable were not significantly different at . LT = mean yield of large tuber, MT = mean yield of medium tuber, ST = mean yield of small tuber, SEM = standard error mean, CV = coefficient of variation, and LSD = least significance difference.