Research Article
Adoption Status and Perception of Farmers on Improved Tef Technology Packages: Evidence from East Gojjam Zone, Ethiopia
Table 22
Farmers’ perception towards row planting method.
| Attributes of row planting method | Distribution of respondents based on the perception of Tef row planting (frequency) | Item mean | SD | SA | A | ND | D | SD |
| Relative advantage | High yield | 158 | 37 | 27 | 27 | 0 | 4.56 | 0.73 | Reduce seed cost | 154 | 63 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 4.65 | 0.53 | Reduce fertilizer cost | 150 | 65 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 4.59 | 0.68 | Tolerance to lodging | 18 | 117 | 42 | 25 | 22 | 3.37 | 1.10 | Convenient for weeding | 125 | 84 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 4.49 | 0.62 | Total mean | | | | | | 21.66 | | Grand mean | | | | | | 4.33 | |
| Relative disadvantage | Consume high labor | 190 | 32 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4.82 | 0.50 | Time consume | 170 | 52 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4.73 | 0.55 | Low straw quality | 160 | 56 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 4.65 | 0.63 | Total mean | | | | | | 14.2 | | Grand mean | | | | | | 4.73 | |
|
|
Source: own survey (2020). SA = strongly agree, A = agree, ND = no decision, SD = strongly disagree, and D = disagree.
|