Evaluations of Different Seed-Dressing Fungicides with Chickpea Varieties for the Management of Fusarium Wilt in Eastern Amhara, Ethiopia
Table 3
Effect of seed-dressing fungicides and chickpea varieties on seed yield, growth parameters, and on fusarium wilt disease epidemics at Lalibella district.
Treatment
SC
PH
MD
PPP
SPP
BM
SY (t/ha)
INC %
AUDPC
Varieties
Mitk
22.92
27.05
90.1
21.75
1.1
3.7
0.8
6.23
292.1
Arerti
22.66
26.72
100.7
21.97
1.07
5.6
0.6
23.5
1166.5
Local
12.66
25.29
92.5
26.04
1.54
2.5
0.4
43.6
2166.7
Mean
19.41
26.35
94.41
23.25
1.23
3.95
0.6
24.42
1208.4
LSD (0.05)
5.98
1.96
5.39
7.04
0.17
1.02
0.21
20.26
1021.7
Fungicides
Apron star
20.3
27.14
92.2
24.03
1.13
3.8
0.62
24.3
1186
Noble
17.5
24.59
100.2
21.29
1.28
3.9
0.43
15.9
800
Thiram
20.0
26.9
90.8
27.95
1.30
3.6
0.72
18.7
1337
Control
19.7
26.7
94.3
19.7
1.23
4.2
0.60
28.7
1409
Mean
19.41
26.35
94.41
23.25
1.23
3.95
0.6
22.01
1183.4
CV %
36.5
2.67
6.78
35.9
16.53
30.51
41
98.4
100.3
LSD (0.05)
6.9
1.95
6.2
8.12
0.19
1.17
0.24
23.4
1179
SC, stand count; PH, plant height; MD, days to maturity; PPP, pod per plant; SPP, seed per pod; BM, biomass; SY, seed yield in ton per hectare; INC, incidence in percentage; AUDPC, area under disease progress curve in percent day; CV, coefficient of variation; LSD, least significant difference.
