Research Article

Comparison of Teff (Eragrostis teff (Zucc.) Trotter) Varieties in Response to Blended NPSZnB Fertilizer On-Farm and on Research Station

Table 10

Mean values of lodging index (%) of teff as influenced by the interaction effect of location by variety and location by blended NPSZnB fertilizer rates.

TreatmentLodging index (%)
On-farmOn-station

Varieties
 Dagim42.73ab46.67a
 Kora43.80ab40.00ab
 Nigus39.47ab28.33b
LSD (0.05)17.95
CV (%)21.80
NPSZnB (kg ha−1)
 011.67g16.67fg
 5020.00fg25.00ef
 10032.00de38.89cd
 15063.78b47.22c
 20082.56a63.89b
Mean42.0038.33
LSD (0.05)9.98
CV (%)26.48

Where LSD (0.05) = least significant difference at 5% level; CV = coefficient of variation. Means in columns and rows followed by the same letters are not significantly different at 95% significant level.