Research Article

Comparison of Teff (Eragrostis teff (Zucc.) Trotter) Varieties in Response to Blended NPSZnB Fertilizer On-Farm and on Research Station

Table 5

Physiological maturity and height of teff as influenced by the interaction effects of location, variety, and NPSZnB fertilizer rates.

Treatments90% physiological maturity (days)Teff height (cm)
VarietiesFertilizer (kg ha−1)On-farmOn-stationOn-farmOn-station

Dagim0123.00a93.67h77.33k82.67ijk
50118.33c91.67i101.63bcd86.33hijk
100115.00d88.33j97.37cdefg97.33cdefg
150110.00f85.33kl104.63bc106.00bc
200110.00f82.67mn97.33cdefg119.33a

Kora0120.33b89.67j65.47l93.33defghi
50117.33c86.67k90.50efghij97.00cdefgh
100113.33e84.00lm89.40efghij103.00bcd
150110.00f81.33no98.93bcde108.33b
200106.00g80.00o98.70bcdef122.67a

Nigus0118.00c77.67p78.27k64.67l
50115.00d75.67q87.63ghijk80.67jk
100110.67f74.33b90.67efghij86.67ghijk
150105.00g72.67r88.03fghijk93.00defghi
200105.00g70.67s90.60efghij105.33bc

Mean113.1382.2990.4396.42

LSD (0.05)1.6310.88
CV (%)1.027.13

Where LSD (0.05) = least significant difference at 5% level; CV = coefficient of variation. Means in column and row of the same parameter followed by the same letters are not significantly differed at 95% significance.