Comparison of Teff (Eragrostis teff (Zucc.) Trotter) Varieties in Response to Blended NPSZnB Fertilizer On-Farm and on Research Station
Table 8
Means of biomass, grain, and straw yields of teff as influenced by the interaction effects of location by variety and location by NPSZnB fertilizer rates.
Treatment
Biomass yield (kg ha−1)
Grain yield (kg ha−1)
Straw yield (kg ha−1)
On-farm
On-station
On-farm
On-station
On-farm
On-station
Varieties
Dagim
5423c
7019ab
1294bc
1654ab
4129c
5365ab
Kora
5475c
7639a
1261bc
1944a
4175c
5696a
Nigus
5167c
5850bc
1270bc
1126c
3896c
4725bc
LSD (0.05)
1316
467
885
CV (%)
29.74
16.85
26.14
NPSZnB (kg ha−1)
0
2411h
4742g
490f
639f
1921h
4103fg
50
4997fg
5754def
1126de
1089e
3871g
4666def
100
5595efg
6596cd
1375cde
1441cd
4223efg
5155cd
150
6429de
8222ab
1616bc
2227a
4813de
5995ab
200
7341bc
8868a
1767b
2477a
5507bc
6391a
Mean
5355
6836
1275
1574
4067
5262
LSD (0.05)
884
323
625
CV (%)
15.46
24.18
14.28
Where LSD (0.05) = least significant difference at 5% level; CV = coefficient of variation. Means in column and row for the same parameter followed by the same letters are not significantly different at 95% significance level.