Research Article

Comparison of Teff (Eragrostis teff (Zucc.) Trotter) Varieties in Response to Blended NPSZnB Fertilizer On-Farm and on Research Station

Table 9

Mean values of harvest index of teff as influenced by the interaction effects of location, variety, and blended NPSZnB fertilizer rates.

TreatmentsHarvest index (%)
VarietyFertilizer (kg ha−1)On-farmOn-station

Dagim021.95defgh17.88hi
5024.03bcdef20.12fgh
10025.75abcd20.18efgh
15024.88abcd27.89ab
20021.99defgh27.82ab

Kora019.57gh14.06ij
5019.83gh24.81abcd
10023.34cdefg26.01abcd
15024.46bcd27.94ab
20025.29abcd28.68a

Nigus018.61h7.56k
5024.89abcd10.17jk
10024.24bcde18.76h
15026.04abcd25.00abcd
20024.92abcd27.06abc

Mean23.3221.60

LSD (0.05)4.12
CV (%)11.23

Where LSD (0.05) = least significant difference at 5% level; CV = coefficient of variation; Means in column and row followed by the same letters are not significantly different at 95% significance level.