Research Article
Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Nickel–Titanium Rotary Instruments after Simulated Clinical Use
Table 3
Pairwise multiple comparison result for AF F-one group.
| AF F-one group | | Mean difference (I–J) | Sig. | 95% confidence interval | Lower bound | Upper bound |
| New | One use | 2210.950* | 0.000 | 1982.838 | 4105.862 | Two use | 2105.600* | 0.001 | 1026.864 | 3184.336 | Three use | 2003.750* | 0.001 | 932.312 | 3075.188 | One use | Two use | −105.750* | 0.000 | −1296.485 | −581.015 | Three use | −207.600* | 0.000 | −1332.950 | −748.250 | Two use | Three use | −101.850* | 0.898 | −518.540 | 314.840 |
|
|
*= mean difference of number of cycles to fracture between two group of instruments. - = number of cycles to fracture in this group was increased.
|