[Retracted] The Application of a Multidimensional Prediction Model in the Recurrence of Female Pelvic Organ Prolapse after Surgery

Table 1

Single factor analysis of the influence of POP postoperative recurrence.

Factors	Recurrence group ()	Nonrecurrence group ()
Age (years)^a			5.519	0.01
BMI (kg/m^2)^a			8.042	0.01
Number of deliveries^a			1.337	0.182
Chronic constipation^b			0.149	0.700
Yes	18 (21.43)	42 (19.44)
No	66 (78.57)	174 (80.56)
Hysterectomy^b			0.317	0.573
Yes	4 (4.76)	14 (6.48)
No	80 (95.24)	202 (93.52)
Prolapse degree^b			58.177	0.01
I	16 (19.05)	115 (53.24)
II	20 (23.81)	69 (31.94)
III	48 (57.14)	32 (14.82)
Surgical approach^b			2.310	0.511
Hysterectomy+anterior colporrhaphy or posterior colporrhaphy	60 (71.43)	159 (73.61)
Abdominal vaginosacropexy	3 (3.57)	8 (3.70)
Manchester procedure	15 (17.86)	26 (12.04)
Mesh repair surgery	6 (7.14)	23 (10.65)
GH (cm)^a			11.206	0.01
TC (mmol/L)^a			1.626	0.105
TG (mmol/L)^a			1.351	0.178
HDL (mmol/L)^a			0.612	0.541
LDL (mmol/L)^a			1.675	0.095
TT (s)^a			1.546	0.123
PT (s)^a			1.035	0.302
Ca (mmol/L)^a			5.632	0.01
Follow-up time (month)^a			1.287	0.199

^a; ^b (percentage).