Research Article
The Effect of Standing Mats on Biomechanical Characteristics of Lower Limbs and Perceived Exertion for Healthy Individuals during Prolonged Standing
Table 2
Comparison of perceived exertion and foot biomechanical parameters change within and between groups.
| Items | Subitems | Group | Paired test | | Student’s -test | Before | After | Mean difference | value | | value |
| RPE (point) | Foot | GS | | | | <0.05 | 2.60 | <0.05 | MS | | | | <0.05 | Shank | GS | | | | <0.05 | 2.95 | <0.05 | MS | | | | <0.05 | Knee | GS | | | | <0.05 | 2.95 | <0.05 | MS | | | | <0.05 | Thigh | GS | | | | <0.05 | 2.95 | <0.05 | MS | | | | <0.05 | Waist | GS | | | | <0.05 | 3.54 | <0.01 | MS | | | | <0.05 | COP amplitude (mm) | X-axis | GS | | | | 0.08 | 2.45 | <0.05 | MS | | | | 0.07 | Y-axis | GS | | | | 0.10 | 2.14 | <0.05 | MS | | | | <0.05 | Peak plantar pressure (kPa) | BH | GS | | | | <0.05 | 0.56 | 0.581 | MS | | | | 0.21 | OT | GS | | | | <0.05 | 0.16 | 0.874 | MS | | | | <0.05 | MF | GS | | | | <0.05 | 2.35 | <0.05 | MS | | | | 0.46 | LF | GS | | | | <0.05 | 2.63 | <0.05 | MS | | | | 0.14 | M | GS | | | | 0.25 | 2.60 | <0.05 | MS | | | | 0.30 | H | GS | | | | 0.44 | 2.95 | <0.05 | MS | | | | 0.55 | AI | AI | GS | | | | 0.67 | 2.68 | <0.05 | MS | | | | 0.85 |
|
|
GS: hard ground surface; MS: standing mat surface; BH: hallux; OT: other toes; MF: median foot; LF: lateral foot; M: midfoot; H heal; AI: arch index.
|