[Retracted] Clinical Characteristics, Treatment, and Visual Prognosis in Pediatric Endophthalmitis: A 232-Case Retrospective Study
Table 3
Relationship between operative method and final VA.
Operative method
Final VA, (%)
Total
EE
NLP
LP
HM
CF-20/200
20/200 or better
INA
3 (42.9)
3 (42.9)
0 (0)
0 (0)
1 (14.2)
0 (0)
7 (3.0)
PPV
8 (21.6)
0 (0)
4 (10.8)
8 (21.6)
14 (37.8)
3 (8.1)
37 (15.9)
PPV + INA
5 (44.4)
1 (5.6)
3 (16.7)
2 (11.1)
2 (11.1)
5 (27.8)
18 (7.8)
PPV + oil
40 (27.6)
12 (8.3)
19 (13.1)
24 (16.6)
39 (26.9)
11 (7.6)
145 (62.5)
PPV + gas
1 (7.7)
0 (0)
0 (0)
4 (30.8)
7 (53.8)
1 (7.7)
13 (5.6)
Enucleated
0 (0)
5 (100)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
5 (2.2)
Inv
2 (28.6)
0 (0)
1 (14.2)
0 (0)
2 (28.6)
2 (28.6)
7 (3.0)
Total
59 (25.4)
21 (91)
27 (11.6)
38 (16.4)
65 (28.0)
22 (9.5)
232
INA: intravitreal antibiotic injection; PPV: pars plana vitrectomy; PPV + oil: pars plana vitrectomy combined with silicone oil filling; PPV + gas: pars plana vitrectomy combined with gas filling; Inv: intravenous injection; VA: visual acuity; EE: enucleated or eviscerated; NLP: no light perception; LP: light perception; HM: hand motions; CF: counting fingers.
