Research Article
Optimization of Thumb Prosthesis Design by Using Five Performance Criteria
Table 4
Thumb optimum design variables versus optimization problem.
| | 10-6(°) | (°) | (N.mm) | (US $) | | | | | |
| (°) | 65.0351 | 65.0354 | 56.9923 | 61.2194 | 87.3142 | 63.3855 | 82.1528 | 82.0630 | 78.1932 | (mm) | 7.5493 | 7.5492 | 9.3495 | 7.2766 | 8.3944 | 5.9964 | 5.0942 | 5.0603 | 5.0603 | (mm) | 73.5694 | 75.5937 | 77.6547 | 75.4232 | 7 1.6646 | 74.9943 | 36.9875 | 37.0354 | 37.0354 | (mm) | 11.8156 | 11.8154 | 12.8802 | 11.2983 | 11.2842 | 9.5121 | 6.0577 | 6.0197 | 6.0197 | (°) | 352.4660 | 354.6590 | 360.0000 | 35 1.668 | 346.5512 | 344.8354 | 375.7396 | 375.6806 | 375.6806 | (mm) | 1 .0624 | 1.1157 | 1.2784 | 1.1414 | 1.0824 | 1.1362 | 0.8485 | 0.8517 | 0.8517 | (mm) | 17.0718 | 17.0714 | 15.7538 | 15.0278 | 18.2923 | 15.0012 | 20.0003 | 20.0001 | 20.0001 | (mm) | 5.0000 | 5.0000 | -4.9873 | 5.0000 | -0.2794 | -4.9827 | 5.0002 | 5.0001 | 5.0001 | (mm) | 15.0000 | 15.2874 | 17.0000 | 17.0000 | 14.5945 | 12.6336 | 10.0000 | 10.0000 | 10.0000 |
|
|