Research Article
A Data-Driven Approach for Fatigue Detection during Running Using Pedobarographic Measurements
Table 2
The relative time of peak force in the 10 areas in the pre-fatigue versus post-fatigue at the nondominant and dominant foot during running gait.
| Areas | Non-dominant foot | Dominant foot | Pre (%) | Post (%) | p-Value | Pre (%) | Post (%) | p-Value |
| H | 56.99 (9.07) | 57.26 (11.14) | 0.84 | 55.6 (12.71) | 58.9 (13.02) | 0.04 | OT | 52.51 (11.90) | 55 (13.46) | 0.17 | 53.34 (11.59) | 52.43 (12.95) | 0.58 | M1 | 56.99 (9.33) | 55.8 (11.58) | 0.27 | 56.22 (10.75) | 56.33 (10.62) | 0.92 | M2 | 58.97 (6.19) | 58.7 (7.09) | 0.74 | 58.47 (5.96) | 58.32 (6.38) | 0.86 | M3 | 56.74 (3.46) | 56.87 (4.62) | 0.22 | 56.98 (4.39) | 56.51 (5.23) | 0.49 | M4 | 54.46 (5.01) | 54.00 (7.09) | 0.56 | 55.93 (5.60) | 55.70 (6.31) | 0.77 | M5 | 57.03 (7.88) | 57.38 (9.23) | 0.76 | 62.23 (6.59) | 59.62 (11.30) | 0.05 | MF | 53.26 (6.40) | 50.50 (7.14) | 0.001 | 53.87 (6.75) | 53.61 (8.09) | 0.81 | HM | 25.37 (18.94) | 25.3 (17.58) | 0.97 | 24.48 (19.59) | 24.57 (17.30) | 0.97 | HL | 11.02 (11.54) | 11.62 (10.25) | 0.72 | 14.50 (15.19) | 11.29 (10.64) | 0.07 | SUM | 31.61 (4.76) | 29.7 (6.06) | 0.01 | 33.47 (6.32) | 32.38 (7.86) | 0.28 |
|
|
Note. “ ” means significant difference between pre- and post-fatigue state ( ). Nondominant foot = left foot; dominant foot = right foot. |