Research Article
High-Performance Method for Brain Tumor Feature Extraction in MRI Using Complex Network
Table 4
Compare accuracy with several similar classifiers.
| Classifier | Paper | High accuracy (%) |
| SVM | Sarkar et al. [8] | 98.30 | Hamid et al. [9] | 95.00 | Ansari et al. [10] | 98.91 | Li et al. [11] | 88.00 | Alves et al. [12] | 76.60 | Kang et al. [13] | 98.50 | Jena et al. [14] | 94.25 | Nanmaran et al. [15] | 96.8 | Susanto et al. [16] | 98.65 | Aamir et al. [17] | 98.98 | This study | 99.69 |
| kNN | Alves et al. [12] | 80.60 | Kang et al. [13] | 98.50 | Jena et al. [14] | 87.88 | Nanmaran et al. [15] | 91.75 | This study | 98.84 |
| Naive Bayes | Kang et al. [13] | 90.20 | Jena et al. [14] | 97 | This study | 98.55 |
| Random forests | Alves et al. [12] | 82.70 | Kang et al. [13] | 97.17 | This study | 99.71 |
|
|