Research Article
A Flexible Bridge Rating Method Based on Analytical Evidential Reasoning and Monte Carlo Simulation
Table 5
Paired comparison of elements structural importance.
| | 
 |  | Component | Element | Weights |  | 
 |  | Deck (0.33) | Wearing surface | 0.17 |  | Sidewalk | 0.03 |  | Deck topside | 0.33 |  | Deck underside | 0.27 |  | Curbs | 0.03 |  | Expansion joints | 0.17 |  | 
 |  | Superstructure (0.33) | Strings | 0.30 |  | Floor beams | 0.30 |  | Floor system bracing | 0.05 |  | Girders | 0.30 |  | Bearing devices | 0.05 |  | 
 |  | Substructure (0.33) | Abutments (0.50) | Bearing seats | 0.04 |  | Backwall | 0.33 |  | Wingwalls | 0.33 |  | Piles | 0.15 |  | Footing | 0.15 |  | Piers (0.50) | Piles | 0.42 |  | Footing | 0.42 |  | Columns | 0.08 |  | Caps | 0.08 |  | 
 | 
 |