Research Article
Developing an IFC-Based Database for Construction Quality Evaluation
Table 15
Evaluation of the proposed method.
| Evaluation questions | Participant | | Mean | Poor (0∼2) | Fair (2∼4) | Average (4∼6) | Good (6∼8) | Excellent (8∼10) |
| 1. How familiar were you with BIM? | Construction Manager () | | 6.77 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 33 | 12 | Structural designer () | | 5.98 | 0 | 2 | 27 | 19 | 5 |
| 2. To what extent can IFC-based quality database improve information integration of construction quality? | Construction Manager () | | 7.55 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 37 | 10 | Structural designer () | | 6.99 | 0 | 0 | 31 | 18 | 4 |
| 3. To what extent can IFC-based quality database improve information utilization of construction quality? | Construction Manager () | | 7.27 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 22 | 26 | Structural designer () | | 6.5 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 25 | 8 |
| 4. To what extent can IFC-based quality database improve the visualization of quality management? | Construction Manager () | | 7.73 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 21 | 36 | Structural designer () | | 7.18 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 20 | 20 |
| 5. To what extent can IFC-based quality database improve work efficiency of quality management? | Construction Manager () | | 5.34 | 0 | 12 | 29 | 20 | 3 | Structural designer () | | 5.02 | 0 | 15 | 20 | 18 | 0 |
| 6. To what extent can IFC-based quality database improve understanding of construction quality control? | Construction Manager () | | 6.82 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 24 | 19 | Structural designer () | | 6.12 | 0 | 5 | 17 | 21 | 10 |
| 7. How useful do you consider the overall method proposed? | Construction Manager () | | 5.88 | 0 | 7 | 22 | 30 | 5 | Structural designer () | | 5.01 | 0 | 6 | 16 | 28 | 3 |
|
|