A Comparative Test Study on the Seismic Damage Sustained by Frame-Core Tube Structures

<table class="table-group" id="tab6"><tr><td><table class="table"><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="9"><hr/></td></tr><tr class="thead"><td class="align_left" rowspan="2">Component</td><td class="align_center" rowspan="2">Stirrup</td><td class="align_center" rowspan="2">Location</td><td class="align_center" colspan="6">Flexural reinforcement</td></tr><tr class="thead"><td class="align_center">1F</td><td class="align_center">2∼5F</td><td class="align_center">6∼10F</td><td class="align_center">11∼15F</td><td class="align_center">16∼21F</td><td class="align_center">22∼25F</td></tr><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="9"><hr/></td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">Frame beam</td><td class="align_center">1</td><td class="align_center">Beam end</td><td class="align_center">0.67</td><td class="align_center">0.58</td><td class="align_center">0.67</td><td class="align_center">0.53</td><td class="align_center">0.67</td><td class="align_center">0.5</td></tr><tr class="table-tr"><td colspan="9"><hr class="tbody-hr"/></td></tr></table></td></tr></table>

<div>Value of <svg height="12.7178pt" id="M38" style="vertical-align:-3.42947pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -9.28833 32.452 12.7178" width="32.452pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M516 277C516 378 460 448 376 448C335 448 288 434 240 401C158 345 127 277 107 159C53 -161 38 -221 23 -247L28 -261C43 -260 95 -250 114 -226C122 -216 129 -199 146 -75C152 -29 157 0 164 31C182 9 206 -12 237 -12C267 -12 325 8 376 46C451 102 516 179 516 277ZM432 259C432 134 366 40 259 40C236 40 204 48 171 76L195 203C219 327 253 400 326 400C398 400 432 336 432 259Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,6.162,3.132)"><path d="M381 665C170 665 44 498 44 318C44 125 188 -15 369 -15C552 -15 703 117 703 333C703 534 550 665 381 665ZM359 629C491 629 601 517 601 306C601 114 502 21 390 21C249 21 146 158 146 346S248 629 359 629Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,13.483,0)"><path d="M368 703H309L44 -163H104L368 703Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,18.844,0)"><path d="M516 277C516 378 460 448 376 448C335 448 288 434 240 401C158 345 127 277 107 159C53 -161 38 -221 23 -247L28 -261C43 -260 95 -250 114 -226C122 -216 129 -199 146 -75C152 -29 157 0 164 31C182 9 206 -12 237 -12C267 -12 325 8 376 46C451 102 516 179 516 277ZM432 259C432 134 366 40 259 40C236 40 204 48 171 76L195 203C219 327 253 400 326 400C398 400 432 336 432 259Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,25.006,3.132)"><path d="M719 650H483V622C553 619 576 606 581 560C585 532 588 487 588 394V148H585L167 650H20V622C67 618 88 610 109 585C127 562 129 557 129 484V264C129 173 126 124 123 93C118 44 92 31 35 28V0H272V28C204 32 181 44 176 95C173 124 170 172 170 264V515H172L598 -9H629V394C629 487 631 532 635 563C639 606 663 619 719 622V650Z"></path></g></svg> in frame beam.</div>

Advances in Civil Engineering

tab6

Table 6

Table 6: A Comparative Test Study on the Seismic Damage Sustained by Frame-Core Tube Structures 