Comparison of Environmental Impacts of Two Alternative Stabilization Techniques on Expansive Soil Slopes

<table class="table-group" id="tab2"><tr><td><table class="table"><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="5"><hr/></td></tr><tr class="thead"><td class="align_left" rowspan="2">Fuel type</td><td class="align_center" rowspan="2">Net calorific value (MJ/kg)</td><td class="align_center" colspan="3">Default emission factor (kg/TJ)</td></tr><tr class="thead"><td class="align_center">CO<sub>2</sub></td><td class="align_center">CH<sub>4</sub></td><td class="align_center">N<sub>2</sub>O</td></tr><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="5"><hr/></td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">Diesel</td><td class="align_center">43</td><td class="align_center">74100</td><td class="align_center">3</td><td class="align_center">0.6</td></tr><tr class="table-tr"><td colspan="5"><hr class="tbody-hr"/></td></tr></table></td></tr></table>

<div>Carbon emission factor of diesel.</div>

Advances in Civil Engineering

tab2

Table 2

Table 2: Comparison of Environmental Impacts of Two Alternative Stabilization Techniques on Expansive Soil Slopes 