Comparison of Environmental Impacts of Two Alternative Stabilization Techniques on Expansive Soil Slopes

<table class="table-group" id="tab4"><tr><td><table class="table"><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="3"><hr/></td></tr><tr class="thead"><td class="align_left">Machinery</td><td class="align_center">Diesel (kg/shift)</td><td class="align_center">Mechanical quota</td></tr><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="3"><hr/></td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">Excavator</td><td class="align_center">92.12</td><td class="align_center">100 m<sup>3</sup>/0.105 shift</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">Bulldozer</td><td class="align_center">120.35</td><td class="align_center">100 m<sup>3</sup>/0.312 shift</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">Rotovator</td><td class="align_center">115.15</td><td class="align_center">100 m<sup>3</sup>/0.124 shift</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">Grader</td><td class="align_center">134.2</td><td class="align_center">100 m<sup>3</sup>/0.0585 shift</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">Roller</td><td class="align_center">105.6</td><td class="align_center">100 m<sup>3</sup>/0.143 shift</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">Dump truck</td><td class="align_center">67.89</td><td class="align_center">100 m<sup>3</sup>/1.232 shift</td></tr><tr class="table-tr"><td colspan="3"><hr class="tbody-hr"/></td></tr></table></td></tr></table>

<div>Mechanical construction and shift quota.</div>

Advances in Civil Engineering

tab4

Table 4

Table 4: Comparison of Environmental Impacts of Two Alternative Stabilization Techniques on Expansive Soil Slopes 