Leveraging Micro-Level Building Information Modeling for Managing Sustainable Design: United Kingdom Experience

Table 1

Summary of the literature on Building Information Modeling (BIM) adoption in terms of BIM players.

Building Information Modeling (BIM) adoption level	BIM player	BIM adoption issue	Research method	Country of study	Source
Macro level	From authority, large organization, and industry associations to small organizations	Conceptual structures	Theory-building and secondary data	Worldwide	Succar and Kassem [9, 10]
Micro Level	A large owner organization	Organizational and project contexts in facility management	Case study	Canada	Cavka et al. [11]
	Small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in construction	Factors	Face-to-face interview and follow-up online questionnaire	Australia	Hong et al. [12]
	Mechanical contracting SMEs	A mechanism	Case study and semistructured interviews	Canada	Poirier et al. [13]
	Estimating organizations	Adjustment of organizational structure	Focus group	Australia	Olatunji [14]
	Public facility agencies	Actions’ impacts on project benefits and occupant value	Case studies	Worldwide	Gurevich et al. [15]
	Key project stakeholders	Project management	Interview	Mediterranean countries	Travaglini et al. [16]
	Leading construction contractor	Factors of barrier	Online questionnaire	United Kingdom	Eadie et al. [17]
	Designers (i.e., engineer, architect, and landscape architect)	Factors of barrier	Questionnaire	Hong Kong, China	Chan [18]
	Architectural firms (team of architects)	Technology, organization, and environment	Questionnaire	India	Ahuja et al. [19]
	Architectural firms	Process of lean design practice	Face-to-face interviews	United Kingdom	Arayici et al. [20]
	Architects in Shenzhen city	Factors	Questionnaire	China	Ding et al. [21]
	Architects	Behavioral intentions	Face-to-face interviews	Republic of Korea	Son et al. [22]