Research Article
Liquefiable Ground Treatment Using Cruciform Section Probe Resonant Compaction Method: A Case Study in the Xitong Expressway, Eastern China
Table 10
Liquefiable evaluations by the CPT.
| Hole number | Depth (m) | dw (m) | qc (MPa) | qccr (MPa) | qc/qccr |
| 9 | 0–1.5 | 1.34 | 3.52 | 2.83 | 1.24 | 1.6–4.9 | 1.34 | 4.22 | 2.72 | 1.55 | 5.0–9.6 | 1.34 | 7.77 | 2.30 | 3.38 | 9.7–14.0 | 1.34 | 12.79 | 1.59 | 8.04 |
| 10 | 0–2.0 | 1.43 | 3.18 | 2.60 | 1.22 | 2.1–4.4 | 1.43 | 4.12 | 2.89 | 1.43 | 4.5–7.2 | 1.43 | 7.42 | 2.51 | 2.96 | 7.3–14.0 | 1.43 | 11.20 | 1.76 | 6.36 |
| 11 | 0–2.7 | 1.40 | 4.02 | 3.02 | 1.33 | 2.8–5.6 | 1.40 | 6.02 | 2.98 | 2.02 | 5.7–9.5 | 1.40 | 8.95 | 2.24 | 3.40 | 9.6–14.0 | 1.40 | 12.24 | 1.59 | 7.70 |
| 13 | 0–2.1 | 1.50 | 5.80 | 2.96 | 1.96 | 2.2–6.1 | 1.50 | 5.63 | 2.64 | 2.13 | 6.2–10.9 | 1.50 | 7.48 | 2.03 | 3.68 | 11.0–15.0 | 1.50 | 12.95 | 1.34 | 9.66 |
| 14 | 0–2.8 | 1.46 | 3.33 | 2.75 | 1.21 | 2.9–5.5 | 1.46 | 7.32 | 2.76 | 2.65 | 5.6–10.6 | 1.46 | 9.18 | 2.14 | 4.29 | 10.7–15.0 | 1.46 | 13.18 | 1.42 | 9.28 |
| 15 | 0–2.6 | 1.43 | 3.02 | 2.80 | 1.08 | 2.7–7.6 | 1.43 | 6.91 | 2.87 | 2.41 | 7.7–11.2 | 1.43 | 9.33 | 1.92 | 4.86 | 11.3–15.0 | 1.43 | 13.72 | 1.38 | 9.94 |
| 16 | 0–3.0 | 1.50 | 3.0 | 2.42 | 1.24 | 3.1–7.4 | 1.50 | 4.48 | 2.20 | 2.04 | 7.5–9.7 | 1.50 | 8.71 | 2.05 | 4.25 | 9.8–15.0 | 1.50 | 11.65 | 1.49 | 7.82 |
|
|