Research Article
A New Approach for Estimating Rock Discontinuity Trace Intensity Based on Rectangular Sampling Windows
Table 1
Estimated intensity and its % error based on rectangular sampling windows.
| Window size (m)/location number | Estimated value (m−1) | True value (m−1) | % error of Ie | Set 1 | Set 2 | Set 1 | Set 2 | Set 1 | Set 2 |
| 90 × 45/location 1 | 0.114 | 0.092 | 0.084 | 0.088 | −36.3 | −4.8 | 90 × 45/location 2 | 0.223 | 0.073 | 0.227 | 0.053 | 1.6 | −38.9 | 90 × 45/location 3 | 0.182 | 0.152 | 0.189 | 0.125 | 3.5 | −21.8 | 90 × 45/location 4 | 0.093 | 0.111 | 0.081 | 0.082 | −14.9 | −34.9 | 110 × 55/location 1 | 0.128 | 0.096 | 0.096 | 0.091 | −33.8 | −6.1 | 110 × 55/location 2 | 0.207 | 0.091 | 0.216 | 0.069 | 4.3 | −32.4 | 110 × 55/location 3 | 0.179 | 0.128 | 0.179 | 0.126 | 0.4 | −1.7 | 110 × 55/location 4 | 0.101 | 0.091 | 0.084 | 0.085 | −20.0 | −7.1 | 130 × 65/location 1 | 0.142 | 0.097 | 0.106 | 0.093 | −34.7 | −3.7 | 130 × 65/location 2 | 0.174 | 0.088 | 0.203 | 0.078 | 14.0 | −13.2 | 130 × 65/location 3 | 0.171 | 0.110 | 0.173 | 0.122 | 1.2 | 9.6 | 130 × 65/location 4 | 0.092 | 0.096 | 0.086 | 0.087 | −6.9 | −10.0 | Mean value | 0.151 | 0.102 | 0.144 | 0.091 | 4.8 | 11.6 | Coefficient of variation | 0.299 | 0.205 | 0.409 | 0.247 | | | Range | | | | | −36.3 to 14.0 | −38.9 to 9.6 |
|
|