Research Article
A New Approach for Estimating Rock Discontinuity Trace Intensity Based on Rectangular Sampling Windows
Table 2
Estimated intensity and its % error based on circular sampling windows.
| Window size (m)/location number | Estimated value (m−1) | True value (m−1) | % error of Ie | Set 1 | Set 2 | Set 1 | Set 2 | Set 1 | Set 2 |
| 20/location 1 | 0.063 | 0.125 | 0.071 | 0.089 | −31.7 | −31.5 | 20/location 2 | 0.088 | 0.100 | 0.114 | 0.070 | 11.9 | −0.9 | 20/location 3 | 0.275 | 0.100 | 0.281 | 0.069 | 6.7 | −57.2 | 20/location 4 | 0.213 | 0.150 | 0.254 | 0.143 | −43.1 | 5.3 | 20/location 5 | 0.088 | 0.038 | 0.092 | 0.057 | 52.0 | 8.3 | 30/location 1 | 0.075 | 0.125 | 0.063 | 0.109 | −56.1 | 9.3 | 30/location 2 | 0.075 | 0.108 | 0.087 | 0.079 | −12.5 | 17.5 | 30/location 3 | 0.233 | 0.067 | 0.261 | 0.075 | −1.6 | −35.8 | 30/location 4 | 0.183 | 0.108 | 0.207 | 0.123 | −28.5 | 4.2 | 30/location 5 | 0.075 | 0.042 | 0.078 | 0.050 | −31.4 | −30.0 | 40/location 1 | 0.119 | 0.106 | 0.083 | 0.110 | −25.3 | −4.2 | 40/location 2 | 0.131 | 0.063 | 0.109 | 0.083 | −13.6 | 38.4 | 40/location 3 | 0.206 | 0.100 | 0.232 | 0.081 | −20.0 | −13.8 | 40/location 4 | 0.181 | 0.113 | 0.187 | 0.121 | −2.8 | 5.1 | 40/location 5 | 0.088 | 0.075 | 0.081 | 0.061 | 6.1 | −14.3 | Mean value | 0.139 | 0.095 | 0.147 | 0.088 | −4.9 | 7.4 | Coefficient of variation | 0.482 | 0.324 | 0.529 | 0.299 | | | Range | | | | | −56.1 to 52.0 | −57.2 to 38.4 |
|
|