Research Article

Analysis of Cusp Catastrophic Model for Vertical Stability of Drilling Shaft Lining

Table 2

Analysis comparison table between catastrophe model and finite element calculation.

Catastrophic calculation modelFinite element calculation
H (m)Hw (m)E (GPa)I (m4)qc (105 N/m)qw (105 N/m)Hcr (m)Judgment criteriaConclusionFirst-order eigenvalueSecond-order eigenvalueConclusion

28.27513.445.247114.94.2113.770593.48Stable−937.190−937.190Stable
216.27555.20345.105141.1345.453.316588.95Stable24.49324.493Stable
361.27589.80042.54142.7185.3783.23583.10Stable5.400505.40050Stable
505.275171.06440.76138.465.1053.364568.69Stable1.989601.98960Stable
565.275216.73940.12134.474.9473.428566.83Stable1.441301.41130Stable
659.675291.70338.85139.664.693.51557.12Unstable0.905310.90531Unstable