Research Article
Analysis of Cusp Catastrophic Model for Vertical Stability of Drilling Shaft Lining
Table 2
Analysis comparison table between catastrophe model and finite element calculation.
| Catastrophic calculation model | Finite element calculation | H (m) | Hw (m) | E (GPa) | I (m4) | qc (105 N/m) | qw (105 N/m) | Hcr (m) | Judgment criteria | Conclusion | First-order eigenvalue | Second-order eigenvalue | Conclusion |
| 28.275 | 13.4 | 45.247 | 114.9 | 4.211 | 3.770 | 593.48 | | Stable | −937.190 | −937.190 | Stable | 216.275 | 55.203 | 45.105 | 141.134 | 5.45 | 3.316 | 588.95 | | Stable | 24.493 | 24.493 | Stable | 361.275 | 89.800 | 42.54 | 142.718 | 5.378 | 3.23 | 583.10 | | Stable | 5.40050 | 5.40050 | Stable | 505.275 | 171.064 | 40.76 | 138.46 | 5.105 | 3.364 | 568.69 | | Stable | 1.98960 | 1.98960 | Stable | 565.275 | 216.739 | 40.12 | 134.47 | 4.947 | 3.428 | 566.83 | | Stable | 1.44130 | 1.41130 | Stable | 659.675 | 291.703 | 38.85 | 139.66 | 4.69 | 3.51 | 557.12 | | Unstable | 0.90531 | 0.90531 | Unstable |
|
|