A Model for Managing the Performance of CMMS Deployment in High-Rise Office Buildings: A View from Lagos, Nigeria

Table 2

Measurement model for performance of CMMS.

	Items	Loading^a	AVE^b	CR^c	CA^d	rho_A^d
Maintenance identification	MID2	0.874	0.826	0.934	0.894	0.897
	MID3	0.926
	MID4	0.925
Strategic plan	STP2	0.962	0.918	0.957	0.911	0.916
	STP3	0.954
Service level agreement	OM1	0.850	0.709	0.907	0.863	0.87
	OM2	0.834
	OM3	0.881
	OM5	0.801
Standard operating procedure	SOP1	0.906	0.732	0.95	0.939	0.94
	SOP2	0.860
	SOP3	0.826
	SOP4	0.853
	SOP5	0.854
	SOP7	0.840
	SOP8	0.847
Execution procedure	MEP4	0.879	0.761	0.905	0.842	0.843
	MEP5	0.913
	MEP7	0.822
Backlog control	BCPS4	0.937	0.893	0.943	0.88	0.891
	BCPS5	0.952
Maintenance policy	MP10	0.868	0.76	0.95	0.937	0.939
	MP11	0.845
	MP2	0.850
	MP3	0.899
	MP4	0.878
	MP9	0.888
CMMS performance	CMP1	0.842	0.806	0.925	0.878	0.882
	CMP2	0.937
	CMP3	0.911
Maintenance implementation	Pr2	0.726	0.617	0.906	0.875	0.881
	Pr3	0.713
	Pr5	0.804
	Pr6	0.753
	Pr7	0.860
	Pr9	0.847
Personnel attitude	PA2	0.973	0.945	0.972	0.942	0.943
	PA3	0.971
Maintenance review	Per4	0.916	0.883	0.938	0.873	0.977
	Per6	0.963