Research Article

A Model for Managing the Performance of CMMS Deployment in High-Rise Office Buildings: A View from Lagos, Nigeria

Table 4

Specific indirect effects for hypothesis testing.

Original sample (O)Sample mean (M)Standard deviation (STDEV)T statistics (|O/STDEV|) values0.50%99.50%

Execution procedure -> maintenance implementation -> backlog control0.0980.1040.0442.2480.0250.0070.223
Personnel attitude -> execution procedure -> maintenance implementation -> backlog control0.0710.0750.0332.1240.0340.0060.168
SOP -> maintenance implementation -> backlog control0.1100.1140.0542.0600.040−0.0020.284
Personnel attitude -> SOP -> maintenance implementation -> backlog control0.0870.0900.0432.0060.045−0.0020.234
Execution procedure -> maintenance implementation -> CMMS performance0.0800.0850.0421.8970.0580.0100.234
Personnel attitude -> execution procedure -> maintenance implementation -> CMMS performance0.0580.0610.0311.8670.0620.0080.177
SOP -> maintenance implementation -> CMMS performance0.0900.0900.0442.0490.0410.0060.231
Personnel attitude -> SOP -> maintenance implementation -> CMMS performance0.0700.0710.0352.0240.043−0.0010.189
Maintenance ID -> maintenance policy -> CMMS performance0.0320.0320.0570.5590.577−0.1330.197
Personnel attitude -> maintenance policy -> CMMS performance0.1050.0950.0621.6810.093−0.0680.298
SLA -> maintenance policy -> CMMS performance0.1940.1980.0832.3310.0200.0120.417
Personnel attitude -> execution procedure -> maintenance implementation0.1990.2050.0782.5530.0110.0260.432
Personnel attitude -> SOP -> maintenance implementation0.2430.2400.0892.7130.007−0.0050.459

Authors’ compilation.