Research Article

Characteristics of the In Situ Stress Field and Engineering Effect along the Lijiang to Shangri-La Railway on the Southeastern Tibetan Plateau, China

Table 1

Measured in situ stress results along the Lijiang to Shangri-La railway.

No.Lith.Burial depth H/m OrientationQNo.Lith.Burial depth H/m OrientationQ

1Limestone370.110.775.989.67Basalt566.014.4310.0414.96N45°WA
377.311.386.719.79N42ºEA635.918.6112.7216.81
420.712.727.5210.92690.720.6514.2618.26
479.113.548.2212.43N47ºEA719.320.9314.5419.01
483.713.667.2212.55761.922.3515.9620.14N26°WA
493.315.118.3112.8N53ºEA837.223.5916.222.13N34°WA
510.715.198.3313.25873.024.4417.5523.08
2Limestone437.311.266.2911.56N21°WA888.125.0918.223.48
477.512.697.212.638Phyllite239.85.824.166.22
517.415.098.5913.68268.36.594.696.96N15ºWA
544.715.228.8214.41N24°WA290.97.034.827.55
572.015.778.7415.13N20°WA9Limestone253.77.334.996.59
3Basalt294.38.546.027.77N20ºWA283.211.226.987.35N53°WA
299.59.166.597.91N15ºWA310.211.787.548.06
320.88.776.198.47338.514.969.128.79N49°WA
365.89.387.829.67357.814.359.619.29
409.912.248.8610.83362.516.910.559.41N60°WA
459.012.49.7112.1310Limestone170.24.492.774.59N17°WA
4Basalt208.89.446.985.51N18°WA191.14.382.435.15
236.311.948.166.24224.76.583.866.06
278.511.818.947.35241.15.533.866.5N18°WA
319.510.928.568.44254.65.423.916.87N18°WA
347.314.39.839.17N27°WA11Slate197.83.942.935.22
389.814.9511.0310.3216.66.134.125.72N19°WA
408.914.211.1210.8N32°WA244.86.234.46.47
5Basalt274.28.465.687.24N14°WA263.68.595.586.96
280.89.025.747.41282.48.775.767.46
288.18.616.827.6N22°WA301.28.965.957.96N36°WA
313.211.347.568.27330.010.246.738.72
338.712.598.318.94350.410.946.939.26N25°WA
351.213.718.439.27N29°WA358.811.527.519.48
372.815.449.659.8512Slate222.87.55.185.88N42°WA
6Basalt327.811.367.718.51245.79.225.96.49
420.712.779.6210.93N56°WA254.99.316.496.74
444.0159.3511.53263.89.46.086.97
462.615.6810.5312.01N62°WA272.6106.177.2N27°WA
471.915.2710.6212.25290.711.167.347.68
495.11711.8512.86N54°WA305.812.817.998.08N20°WA

Lith: lithology. σH: maximum horizontal principal stress, σh: minimum horizontal principal stress, and σV: vertical stress. The quality ranking (Q) of the WSM project (Heidbach et al., [18]) was used to assess the reliability of the results in each well.