Research Article
Analytical Solutions for Girder Distribution Factor in Steel-Concrete Composite Girders with the Effect of Parapets
Table 5
Comparisons of the girder distribution factor.
| Girder no. | Modified eccentric load method | Simplified method | (②−①)/② × 100% | FE analysis | (④−③)/④ × 100% | Field test | AASHTO LRFD 2017 | (②−⑥)/② × 100% | Without parapet ① | With parapet ② | Without parapet ③ | With parapet ④ | With parapet ⑤ | Without parapet ⑥ |
| 1# | 0.66 | 0.52 | −26.92 | 0.63 | 0.51 | −23.53 | 0.49 | 0.68 | −30.77 | 2# | 0.53 | 0.46 | −15.22 | 0.53 | 0.48 | −10.42 | 0.47 | 0.65 | −41.30 | 3# | 0.40 | 0.41 | 2.44 | 0.40 | 0.42 | 4.76 | — | — | — | 4# | 0.40 | 0.41 | 2.44 | 0.40 | 0.43 | 6.98 | — | — | — | 5# | 0.53 | 0.46 | −15.22 | 0.53 | 0.47 | −12.77 | — | 0.65 | −41.30 | 6# | 0.66 | 0.52 | −26.92 | 0.62 | 0.52 | −19.23 | — | 0.68 | −30.77 |
|
|