Research Article

Influence of the Force Arm on the Flexural Performance of Prestressed Glulam Beams

Table 2

Ultimate load, deflection, and failure mode of test beams.

GroupBeam no.Ultimate load (kN)Deflection (mm)Failure mode
Test valueAverage valueTest valueAverage value

SPF-1.1SPF-1.1 (1)22.4022.5957.5758.34Tension failure of steel bar
SPF-1.1 (2)20.9959.11Tension failure of the lowermost laminate
SPF-1.1 (3)24.39111.55Breakage of the lowermost laminate

SPF-1.2SPF-1.2 (1)24.1281.07
SPF-1.2 (2)23.1675.84Tension failure of the beam bottom
SPF-1.2 (3)25.0886.29Tension failure of the beam bottom

SPF-1.3SPF-1.3 (1)26.48101.28
SPF-1.3 (2)27.3799.43Compression failure of the beam top
SPF-1.3 (3)25.59103.12Ductile tension failure of the beam bottom

SPF-2.2SPF-2.2 (1)23.0325.1588.4685.40
SPF-2.2 (2)25.0883.79Tension failure of the beam bottom
SPF-2.2 (3)27.3383.96Tension failure of the beam bottom

SPF-3.2SPF-3.2 (1)26.5826.0876.2783.23Tension failure of the beam bottom due to the beam-end breakage
SPF-3.2 (2)25.83105.21Tension failure of the beam bottom due to the beam-end breakage
SPF-3.2 (3)25.8368.22Tension failure of the beam bottom due to the beam-end breakage