Effects of Concentration of Pore Solution on Stability of Ion-Absorbed Rare Earth Ore Aggregate

Wang, Jie; Wang, Guanshi; Hong, Bengen

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8846605

Advances in Civil Engineering

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results and Discussion Conclusions Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 | Article ID 8846605 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8846605

Effects of Concentration of Pore Solution on Stability of Ion-Absorbed Rare Earth Ore Aggregate

Jie Wang,^1,2Guanshi Wang,¹and Bengen Hong³

Academic Editor: Gang Zhou

Received21 Sept 2020

Revised27 Feb 2021

Accepted02 Mar 2021

Published23 Mar 2021

Abstract

The continuous change in solution concentration in ore pores during in situ mineral leaching influences the stability of ore aggregate. In this study, influences of the concentration of ammonium sulfate ((NH₄)₂SO₄) solution on the interaction forces between ore particles were calculated. On this basis, the mechanism by which (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution concentration influences the stability of ore aggregate was analyzed. Furthermore, an empirical formula for estimating the critical (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution concentration for aggregation and dispersion of ore body aggregates with different grain composition was proposed. Some major conclusions were drawn. First, for ore bodies with an initial particle size of less than 0.075 mm, the interaction force between particles was net attraction, with the distance range of this force increasing as the concentration of (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution increased from ≤0.001 to 0.16 mol·L⁻¹, aggregation of ore particles occurring within this distance range. Secondly, for ore bodies with initial particle size of less than 0.075 mm, the interaction force between particles was net attraction, but with the distance range of this force decreasing when the (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution concentration increased from 0.16 to 0.28 mol·L⁻¹, dispersion of ore particles occurring beyond this distance range. Thirdly, for ore bodies with particle sizes of less than 0.038, 0.075 and 0.1 mm, the cation exchange capacity (CEC) was 9.13, 8.96, and 8.8 cmol·kg⁻¹, respectively, and the critical (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution concentration affecting the aggregation and dispersion of ore bodies was 0.12, 0.16, and 0.20 mol·L⁻¹, respectively.

1. Introduction

Currently, researchers believe that failure of soil aggregate is due to three processes: expansion, explosion, and scattering [1, 2]. For a dry soil aggregate, soil particles are controlled by net attraction when the distance between soil particles is less than 1.5 nm [3, 4]. In this case, soil aggregate will generally not expand and scatter. When the drying soil aggregate is immersed into water, the distance between two adjacent soil particles increases quickly to 1.5 nm as a result of hydraulic repulsive force. This process is called the expansion process of soil aggregates [5]. Since the hydraulic repulsive force is a short-range force, its sphere of effective action is only 1.5 nm and soil aggregates do not scatter beyond this distance. When the distance between two adjacent soil particles is greater than 1.5 nm, electrostatic repulsion becomes the dominant force and it leads to a continuous increase in distance between soil particles, up to 30–60 nm. Small soil particles are released continuously. This process is called explosion and scattering of soil aggregates [6]. In these ways, Van der Waals forces, electrostatic repulsive force, and hydraulic repulsive force can significantly influence the interaction of soil particles in a water system, thus affecting the stability of soil aggregates [7–15].

For ion-absorbed rare earth ores, in situ mineral leaching is the preferred technique in China [16]. In this technique, ammonium sulfate solution is injected into the ore body through injecting holes, where it undergoes exchange reactions with rare earth ions. Rare earth ions enter the solution and form part of the mother liquor, which is then discharged from the collection device. Therefore, the injection of ammonium sulfate solution changes the concentrations of ions in solution in ore pores and ion content on ore particle surfaces, thus changing electrostatic repulsive forces between ore particles. In other words, the interaction forces between ore particles are changed and the stability of the ore aggregate is affected. It affects the cohesion of ore body and further affects the strength of ore body and the stability of slope.

In this study, influences of (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution concentration on the thickness of the sliding layer in double-electrode layers on ore particle surfaces, and interaction forces of ore particles, were calculated under mixed electrolyte conditions. On this basis, the influencing mechanism of (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution concentration in ore pores on the stability of ore aggregate was determined.

2. Model Building

2.1. Calculation of the Interaction Forces among Ore Particles

Interaction forces between ore particles consist of the sum of electrostatic repulsion (p_R), hydration repulsion (p_h), and Van der Waals forces (p_vdw), according to the following equation:

2.2. Van der Waals Forces between Ore Particles

There is always mutual attraction between ore particles because there is always Van der Waals attraction between atoms or molecules at close range. Van der Waals forces between particles are dependent on the distance between particles and are expressed according to the following equation [17]:where A is the Hamaker constant, with values of A for soil or clay in vacuum and in solution being 12 × 10⁻²⁰ J and 7.8 × 10⁻²⁰ J, respectively. d is the distance between two adjacent particles.

2.3. Hydration Repulsion among Ore Particles

The hydration repulsion force is significantly stronger than the electrostatic repulsion force or Van der Waals force, but it acts over distances of only 1.5 nm. Thus, the hydration repulsion is a short-range acting force [18]. Based on experimental results, Leng [19] proposed that the hydration repulsion force (in atm) between two particles is proportional to the exponent of the distance between the two particles:

2.4. Electrostatic Repulsion between Ore Particles

2.4.1. Electrostatic Repulsion between Particles

Two ore particles were selected as the research objects. These were conceptualized as two plate-like viscous particles with uniform charge distribution on their surfaces. The surfaces of the plates were treated as planes that extend to infinity in the y and z directions; this assumption excludes fringe effects. It was assumed that the two particles equilibrate when the planes that represent the two particles are immersed in an electrolyte solution with a concentration of c₀ at a mutual distance of d. At equilibrium, the mutual repulsion of the double electric layers (p_d) and the external pressure (p₀) exerted by the two planes are equal (Figure 1).

The pressure on a unit volume within this space in the x direction is expressed as follows:

Unit volumes within this space are also subject to an electrostatic force, defined as the product of the charge density and the electric field intensity according to the following equation:

The condition for equilibrium between the two particles is expressed as follows:

Equation (6) can be rearranged to give

The density is defined by equation (8), which can also be expressed as equation (9):where F is the Faraday constant (F = 96490 C·mol⁻¹), R is the universal gas constant (R = 8.314 J·mol⁻¹ K⁻¹), T is the absolute temperature (K), c_i is the ion concentration (mol·L⁻¹), the subscript 0 refers to the bulk solution, z_i is the ionic valence, and ψ(x) is the potential at x m from the particle surface (V).

So,

Therefore, p_R can be calculated using the following equation:

If the pressure is measured in atmospheres (1 atm = 101.325 kPa), then equation (10) becomes

The potential at the center of the gap between the two particles, ψ(d/2), is expressed as follows [20]:

2.4.2. Calculation of Potential on Ore Particle Surface

According to equation (12), it is necessary to calculate the potential on the surface of the ore particles (ψ₀) when calculating ψ(d/2). The method for calculating ψ₀ is explained below.

When the double layer in only the x direction is considered, and adsorption equilibrium is reached, the formula used to calculate the average ion concentration (c₁) in diffusive double electric layers can be defined as follows [21]:

where N_∞ is the total area of adsorbed ions in the diffusion double layer, V is the total area of the diffusion double layer, 1/κ is the thickness of the double layer, and c(x) is the concentration of adsorbed ions from the surface of the solid particle to the distance x. The expression for c(x) is given by

Alternatively, c₁ can be calculated fromwhere CEC is the cation exchange capacity (cmol·kg⁻¹) and S is the specific surface area of particles (m²·g⁻¹).

Ultimately, equations (13) and (15) can be combined using a minimum error method to calculate the potential on the surface of ore particles (ψ₀).

2.4.3. Calculation of ψ(x) on Ore Particle Surface

When calculating the surface potential ψ₀ of ore particles, it is necessary to define the surface potential ψ(x). In order to calculate these two parameters, the diffusion double layer structure on the particle surface needs to be described mathematically. At present, the Guy–Chapman model is the most accepted method to achieve this, and it describes the double layer structure by the Poisson–Boltzmann equation. The nonlinear Poisson–Boltzmann equation for electrolyte solutions is expressed [22]:where ε is the dielectric constant. The variable y is defined by y = Fψ(x)/RT, where ψ(x) is the potential at x m from the particle surface (V).

When ammonium sulfate solution is injected into rare earth ores, ammonium ions in the solution exchange with rare earth ions on the surface of the ore particles. The solution surrounding the ore particles becomes a mixed electrolyte system. For these solutions, equation (16) becomeswhere z_C, z_D, z_E, and z_H are the valences of the ammonium ions, the sulfate ions corresponding to ammonium ions, the rare earth ions, and the sulfate ions corresponding to rare earth ions, respectively; c_C, c_D, c_E, and c_H are the concentrations of the ammonium ions, the sulfate ions corresponding to ammonium ions, the rare earth ions, and the sulfate ions corresponding to rare earth ions, respectively, in mol·L⁻¹. For (NH₄)₂SO₄, z_C = 1, z_D = −2, and c_D = 0.5 c_C. For (RE)₂(SO₄)₃, z_E = 3, z_H = −2, and c_H = 1.5 c_E. With these substitutions, equation (17) becomes

Setting y = y0 at x = 0 and y = y(x) at x = x, and rearranging, equation (18) becomes

Given that y = Fψ(x)/RT, equation (19) can be substituted to produce the following equation for ψ(x):

Here, λ₁ and κ₁ are defined by equations (21) and (22), respectively.

2.5. Thickness of the Sliding Layer in Electric Double Layer

For rare earth ore bodies, when the concentration of (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution exceeds a certain level, ion exchange between the ammonium ions in solution and the rare earth ions on the surface of the ore particles occurs. This changes the ionic composition of the bulk solution around the ore particles and their surface potential, thus changing the thickness of the electric double layer on the surface of the particles. At present, the electric double layer thickness on the surface of particles can be approximately calculated by Debye parameter 1/κ, but this parameter only reflects the influence of the change in solution concentration and does not reflect the influence of the change in surface potential of particles caused by ion exchange. Ding proposed that the sliding layer thickness could be used to describe the electric double layer on the surface of particles [23]. Therefore, this section describes the method for calculating the sliding layer thickness in the double layer on the particle surface, which considers the influence of solution concentration and particle surface potential on the double layer thickness on the particle surface.

Equation (20) can be rearranged to obtain the following equation, an expression for the distance to the particle surface (x):

In electrolyte systems, ψ(x) in equation (20) can be equated with the value of the zeta potential (ζ), so that x can be expressed in terms of the thickness of the sliding layer (x_s), as shown in the following equation:

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Sample Preparation

Ionic clay rare earth ore was used as the test material in this study. The ionic clay was ground and screened using a 0.075 mm sieve. In order to analyze the effect of interaction between ore particles on the measured shear strength of the ore material, the total specific surface area and cation exchange capacity (CEC) of the samples were measured to enable the potential on the ore particle surfaces and the interaction forces between ore particles to be calculated. The total specific surface area was measured using a fully automated specific surface and pore diameter analyzer (Bates 3H-2000PS) utilizing a N₂-B.E.T method. The CEC was measured using an ammonium acetate exchange method.

3.2. Mineral Leaching Experiment Method

Raw ores, which were screened using a 0.075 mm sieve, were collected and (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution (0, 0.04, 0.08, 0.12, 0.16, 0.20, 0.24, and 0.28 mol·L⁻¹) was added. After thorough mixing, a controlled moisture content of 21.8% was reached throughout the sample. A cutting ring was used to form samples with a compaction density of 1.71 g·cm⁻³, diameter 6.18 cm, and height 2 cm. The ore samples were saturated in the cutting ring using the extraction saturation method. The saturation solution used the corresponding concentration of (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution and then the cutting ring was put in a 2 L beaker for mineral leaching at a solid to liquid ratio of 1 : 5. To enable enough time for adequate water-soil chemical reaction of the reshaped ore samples, and to prevent acid erosion of the ore cement by (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution, the reaction time was set to 1 day.

3.3. Ore Gradation Experiment Method

For raw ore with initial particle sizes of less than 0.075 mm, wet samples were tested in a laser particle analyzer (BT2002, China) after leaching in (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution. Each sample analysis was repeated at least five times.

3.4. Zeta Potential Test Method on Ore Particle Surfaces

A set of 0.5 g·L⁻¹ mineral particle suspensions were prepared using four different concentrations of ammonium sulfate solution (0, 0.04, 0.08, 0.12, 0.16, 0.20, 0.24, and 0.28 mol·L⁻¹) and tested in a microelectrophoresis apparatus (JS94H2, China) without pH adjustment. The temperature was maintained at room temperature (25°C) during the test and each sample was tested at least five times. The error range on the measurements was ±2 mv.

4. Results and Discussion

4.1. Variation Law of Interaction Force between Ore Particles

Changes in solution concentration result in changes to the particle surface potential, the zeta potential, and the types of ions contained in the electric double layer. The thickness of double-electrode layers on ore particle surfaces and interaction forces between ore particles also change accordingly. To calculate the thickness of the sliding layer in the double-electrode layers on a particle surface and the interaction force between particles, ammonium ion concentration, rare earth ion (RE) concentration, zeta potential on an ore particle surface, CEC of ore sample, and specific surface area in solution with different concentrations of (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution after mineral leaching were determined. Main indexes of ore samples with initial particle size of less than 0.075 mm are shown in Table 1.

According to a previously reported theoretical calculation model, the concentration of bulk solution cannot be zero when calculating the interaction force between ore particles. Therefore, it is hypothesized that when the concentration of bulk solution is lower than a certain value, the zeta potential on ore particle surfaces does not change, and the electric double layer on the surface of ore body particles is not affected. In this study, (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution was used as the pore solution. The concentration of bulk solution was calculated to be approximately 2 × 10⁻⁴ mol·L⁻¹ from equations (20)–(22) according to the zeta potentials when the concentration of (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution was 0 mol·L⁻¹.

Next, parameters were introduced into the ore particle surface potential calculations. The variation in particle surface potential when the (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution concentration increased from 0 to 0.28 mol·L⁻¹ was obtained. As can be seen from Figure 2, particle surface potential decreased from –372 to –126 mv when the (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution concentration increased from 0 to 0.28 mol·L⁻¹. This was mainly due to the negatively charged particles with one double-electrode layer absorbed on the particle surfaces, resulting in a relatively low initial concentration of ions in the double-electrode layer. With increasing (NH₄)₂SO₄ concentration in the ore pores, the concentration difference drove the movement of ammonium ions in the pore solution towards the double-electrode layer adsorbed onto the soil particle surfaces and then gradually through the double-electrode layer. In addition to ion exchange between some ammonium ions and rare earth ions, some ammonium ions were finally adsorbed on the ore particle surfaces and neutralized negative charges on the ore particles. This decreased the charge of ore particles and the soil particle surface potentials. This research conclusion was consistent with Liu’s [24].

4.1.1. Calculation of Thickness of Sliding Layer on Ore Particle Surface

Given the zeta potential on the particle surfaces and the calculated surface potential, the thickness of the sliding layer in the double-electrode layer on the particle surfaces could be calculated using equation (24). The results are shown in Figure 3. The thickness of the sliding layer decreased from 43.50 to 3.00 nm, when the (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution concentration increased from 0 to 0.16 mol·L⁻¹, and from 3.00 to 3.47 nm, when the (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution concentration increased from 0.16 to 0.28 mol·L⁻¹.

4.1.2. Calculation of Electrostatic Repulsive Force between Ore Particles

With the particle surface potentials now known, variation in the electrostatic repulsion force between particles at different (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution concentrations could be calculated using equation (10). Results are shown in Figure 4.

(a)

(b)

It could be seen from Figure 4 that the electrostatic repulsive force between two fixed ore particles was negatively correlated to the (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution concentration between 0.04 and 0.16 mol·L⁻¹ but was positively correlated from 0.16 to 0.28 mol·L⁻¹. For the electrostatic repulsive force between two fixed ore particles, the main influencing factors included solution concentration and thickness of double electric layer on particle surface [25]. Thus, the variation of electrostatic repulsive force in Figure 4 could be analyzed as follows.

First, when the (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution concentration was lower than 0.16 mol·L⁻¹, there was a negative correlation with the electrostatic repulsive force between ore particles. The existence of an electrostatic repulsive force between particles means there must be an overlap of the double electric layer on the two particle surfaces. Given that there is a certain number of ions in the double-electrode layer, this number of ions increases with expansion of the overlapping area and the electrostatic repulsive force between particles also increases (shadowed areas in Figure 5(a)). According to calculations, the thickness of the sliding layer on the ore particle surface decreased from 43.50 to 3.00 nm when the (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution concentration increased from 0 to 0.16 mol·L⁻¹; in other words, although the number of ions in the double electric layer on the particle surfaces increased with increasing (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution concentration, the thickness of the double-electrode layer decreased and the overlapping region of the double electric layer between two particles became narrower (Figure 5(b)). The net result was a decrease in electrostatic repulsive force between ore particles.

(a)

(b)

(c)

Secondly, when the (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution concentration was greater than 0.16 mol·L⁻¹, the electrostatic repulsive force between particles was positively correlated with concentration. As the (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution concentration increased from 0.16 to 0.28 mol·L⁻¹, the thickness of the sliding layer increased from 3.00 to 3.47 nm. In other words, the thickness of the double electric layer on the particle surfaces increased with increasing (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution concentration and the overlapping area expanded. Furthermore, the number of ions in the double electric layer on the particle surfaces increased accordingly. Therefore as shown in Figures 5(b) and 5(c), the net result was an increase in the electrostatic repulsive force between ore particles.

4.1.3. Calculation of Net Force between Ore Particles

When the surface potential is known, the variation in net force between ore particles at different (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution concentrations can be calculated using equation (1). Results are shown in Figure 6.

Figure 6 shows that when the (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution concentration was ≤0.001 mol·L⁻¹, the distance between particles ranged from 1.55 to 1.75 nm; when the (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution concentration was 0.04 mol·L⁻¹, the distance between particles ranged from 1.55 to 2.70 nm; when the (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution concentration was 0.08 mol·L⁻¹, the distance between particles ranged from 1.55 to 2.80 nm; when the (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution concentration was 0.12 mol·L⁻¹, the distance between particles ranged from 1.55 to 2.90 nm; when the (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution concentration was 0.16 mol·L⁻¹, the distance between particles ranged from 1.55 to 3.05 nm; when (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution concentration was 0.20 mol·L⁻¹, the distance between particles ranged from 1.55 to 3.00 nm; when the (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution concentration was 0.24 mol·L⁻¹, the distance between particles ranged from 1.55 to 3.00 nm; and when the (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution concentration was 0.28 mol·L⁻¹, the distance between particles ranged from 1.55 to 2.90 nm.

Additionally, Figure 6 shows that when the (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution concentration ranged from 0.04 to 0.28 mol·L⁻¹, the net force between ore particles transformed from net repulsion to net attraction when the distance between two particles increased; this net attraction reached a maximum at approximately 1.55 nm. When the (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution concentration ranged from 0.04 to 0.16 mol·L⁻¹, the maximum net attraction was positively correlated with the (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution concentration. In contrast, the maximum net attraction was negatively correlated with the (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution concentration from 0.16 to 0.28 mol·L⁻¹ (Figure 7).

4.2. Effects of (NH₄)₂SO₄ Solution Concentration on the Stability of Ore Aggregate

4.2.1. Determining the Critical (NH₄)₂SO₄ Solution Concentration at Particle Size Less Than 0.075 mm

Particle grading curves of ore bodies at different (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution concentrations were determined. A shown in Figure 8(a), the content of fine particles (<50 μm) decreased while the content of larger particles (>50 μm) increased when the (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution concentration increased gradually from 0 to 0.16 mol·L⁻¹, indicating the clustering of ore particles. Figure 8(b) reveals the opposite phenomenon when the (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution concentration increased from 0.16 to 0.28 mol·L⁻¹, indicating the scattering of ore particles. Therefore, for ore bodies with a particle size of less than 0.075 mm, the critical (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution concentration affecting aggregation and dispersion of ore particles was 0.16 mol·L⁻¹.

(a)

(b)

Changes in the interaction forces between ore particles determine the clustering or scattering behavior of particles. Therefore, the influences of (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution concentration on clustering of ore particles were explained on the basis of the interaction forces between ore particles described in Section 3.1, with further details provided below.

First, when the (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution concentration was lower than the critical concentration, ore particles clustered gradually with increasing (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution concentration. According to the calculated interaction force, the interaction force between particles became net attraction when the (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution concentration was ≤0.001 mol·L⁻¹ and the distance between ore particles was within 1.55–1.75 nm, resulting in ore particles in this distance range clustering together, while ore particles beyond this distance range did not. Similarly, the interaction force between particles was net attraction when the (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution concentration was 0.04, 0.08, 0.12, and 0.16 mol·L⁻¹ and the distance between ore particles was 1.55–2.70, 1.55–2.80, 1.55–2.90, and 1.55–3.05 nm, respectively. This indicated that ore particles clustered into aggregates in these three distance ranges. Therefore, the distance range of net attraction increased when the (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution concentration increased from ≤0.001 to 0.16 mol·L⁻¹ and the ore particles within this distance gradually agglomerated into new aggregates, as shown in Figure 8(a) [26, 27].

Secondly, when the (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution concentration was higher than the critical concentration, ore particles scattered with increasing (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution concentration. According to calculations, the interaction force between particles was net attraction at four (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution concentrations (0.16, 0.20, 0.24, and 0.28 mol·L⁻¹) and four corresponding distance ranges (1.55–3.5, 1.55–3.00, 1.55–3.00, and 1.55–2.90 nm). In other words, ore particles clustered into aggregates in these distance ranges. Therefore, the distance range of net attraction decreased when (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution concentration increased from 0.16 to 0.28 mol·L⁻¹ and ore particles beyond this distance were gradually dispersed, as shown in Figure 8(b) [26, 27].

4.2.2. Effects of CEC on Critical (NH₄)₂SO₄ Solution Concentration

Based on the above analysis, for ore bodies with particle sizes of less than 0.075 mm, the critical (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution concentration affecting aggregation and dispersion of ore particles was determined and the relevant mechanism elucidated. Ore grading after mineral leaching for different particle sizes (0.038 and 0.1 mm) and different (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution concentrations was performed according to the experimental method described in Section 2.1. The results are shown in Figures 9 and 10.

Figures 9 and 10 reveal that the critical (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution concentration was 0.20 mol·L⁻¹ for particles smaller than 0.038 mm and 0.12 mol·L⁻¹ for particles smaller than 0.1 mm. According to calculations of the interaction force between ore particles, solution concentration was the main influencing factor. Therefore, changes in the critical (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution concentration arising from different grading levels was related to changes in CEC, thus influencing changes to the concentration of solution surrounding ore particles [28, 29]. Therefore, the relationship between CEC and critical concentration of (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution was further analyzed (Figure 11).

It can be seen from Figure 11 that there was an exponential relationship between critical (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution concentration and CEC of ore particles: c_cri = a + b exp(CEC/c), where c_cri is the critical concentration of (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution, CEC is the cation exchange capacity on the ore particle surface, and a, b, and c are fitting parameters (a = 0.058, b = 5.18 × 10⁻¹¹, and c = 0.42). The critical (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution concentration can be estimated when the CEC is fixed; on this basis, critical concentrations of (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution at different particle compositions could be determined.

5. Conclusions

For ion-absorbed rare earth ores, the concentration of the injected (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution in in situ mineral leaching is generally no higher than 0.23 mol·L⁻¹. And due to the ion exchange effect, interaction forces between ore particles are changed. This changes the stability of the ore body aggregates, and the particles are aggregated or diffused, which directly affects the cohesive force of the ore body and thus affects the shear strength and stability of the ore body slope. At the same time, the agglomeration or diffusion of ore body particles will directly affect the effective diameter of the pores in the ore body, thus affecting the permeability and directly affecting the mining efficiency. Therefore, the effect of (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution concentration on the interaction force between ore particles was calculated and the mechanism underpinning the effect of (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution concentration on ore aggregate stability was determined. Ultimately, an empirical formula for estimating the critical (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution concentration for aggregation and dispersion of ore body aggregates at different grain compositions was proposed. Some major conclusions could be drawn, which can provide reference for the concentration selection of ammonium sulfate solution in the leaching and mining process of ammonium sulfate solution in different gradation ionic rare earth mines.(1)For ore bodies with initial particle size smaller than 0.075 mm, when the (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution concentration was ≤0.001 mol·L⁻¹, the interaction force between ore particles was net repulsion resulting in ore particle dispersion. The interaction force between particles was net attraction at four (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution concentrations of 0.04, 0.08, 0.12, and 0.16 mol·L⁻¹ and the four corresponding distance ranges of 1.55–2.70, 1.55–2.80 nm, 1.55–2.90 nm, and 1.55–3.05 nm, resulting in ore particle clustering into aggregates within these distance ranges. Therefore, the net attraction distance range increased when the (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution concentration increased from ≤0.001 to 0.16 mol·L⁻¹, resulting in the aggregation of ore particles within this range.(2)For ore bodies with initial particle size of less than 0.075 mm, the interaction force of particles was net attraction at four (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution concentrations of 0.16, 0.20, 0.24, and 0.28 mol·L⁻¹ and the four corresponding distance ranges of 1.55–3.05, 1.55–3.00, 1.55–3.00, and 1.55–2.90 nm, with ore particles clustering into aggregates in these distance ranges. Therefore, the net attraction distance range decreased with increasing (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution concentration from 0.16 to 0.28 mol·L⁻¹, with the dispersion of ore particles beyond the range of net attraction.(3)For ore bodies with particle sizes of less than 0.038, 0.075, and 0.1 mm, the CEC was 9.13, 8.96, and 8.8 cmol·kg⁻¹, respectively. The critical (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution concentration that discriminated between clustering and scatting of ore particles was 0.12, 0.16, and 0.20 mol·L⁻¹, respectively. Therefore, there was an exponential correlation between the critical (NH₄)₂SO₄ solution concentration and CEC.

Notations

p:	Interaction forces between ore particles
p_R:	Electrostatic repulsion
P_h:	Hydration repulsion
p_vdw:	Van der Waals forces
A:	Hamaker constant
d:	The distance between two adjacent particles
c₀:	Concentration of electrolyte solution
P_d:	The mutual repulsion of the double electric layers
p₀:	The external pressure
F_e:	Electrostatic force
F:	Faraday constant (F = 96490 C·mol⁻¹)
R:	Universal gas constant (R = 8.314 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹)
T:	Absolute temperature (K)
c_i:	Ion concentration (mol·L⁻¹), the subscript 0 refers to the bulk solution
z_i:	Ionic valence
ψ(x):	Potential at x m from the particle surface (V)
N:	Total area of adsorbed ions in the diffusion double layer
V:	Total area of the diffusion double layer;
1/κ:	Thickness of the double layer
c(x):	Concentration of adsorbed ions from the surface of the solid particle to the distance x
CEC:	Cation exchange capacity (cmol·kg⁻¹)
S:	Specific surface area of particles (m²·g⁻¹)
Z_c:	The valences of the ammonium ions
z_D:	The valences of the sulfate ions corresponding to ammonium ions
z_E:	The valences of the rare earth ions
z_H:	The valences of the sulfate ions corresponding to rare earth ions
c_C:	The concentrations of the ammonium ions
c_D:	The concentrations of the sulfate ions corresponding to ammonium ions
c_E:	The concentrations of the rare earth ions
c_H:	The concentrations of the sulfate ions corresponding to rare earth ions
ζ:	Zeta potential
x_s:	The thickness of the sliding layer.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work was jointly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41602311, 51874147, and 51664015) and the Qingjiang Talent Project of Jiangxi University of Science and Technology (JXUSTQJBJ2016007).

References

J. Bartlova, B. Badalikova, L. Pospisilova, E. Pokorny, and B. Sarapatka, “Water stability of soil aggregates in different systems of tillage,” Soil and Water Research, vol. 10, no. 3, p. 147, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Phocharoen, S. Aramrak, N. Chittamart, and W. Wisawapipat, “Potassium influence on soil aggregate stability,” Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, vol. 49, no. 17, p. 2162, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L.-F. Wang, L.-L. Wang, X.-D. Ye et al., “Coagulation kinetics of humic aggregates in mono- and di-valent electrolyte solutions,” Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 47, no. 10, p. 5042, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Hu, S. Li, C. Xu et al., “Effect of soil particle interaction forces in a clay‐rich soil on aggregate breakdown and particle aggregation,” European Journal of Soil Science, vol. 70, no. 2, p. 268, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. N. Hu, C. Y. Xu, H Li et al., “Particles interaction forces and their effects on soil aggregates breakdown,” Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 147, no. 1, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Li, H. Li, C.-Y. Xu, X.-R. Huang, D.-T. Xie, and J.-P. Ni, “Particle interaction forces induce soil particle transport during rainfall,” Soil Science Society of America Journal, vol. 77, no. 5, p. 1563, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. B. Han, G. Zhou, D. H. Gao et al., “Experimental analysis of the pore structure and fractal characteristics of different metamorphic coal based on mercury intrusion-nitrogen adsorption porosimetry,” Powder Technology, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Zhou, B. Feng, W. Yin, and J. Wang, “Numerical simulations on airflow-dust diffusion rules with the use of coal cutter dust removal fans and related engineering applications in a fully-mechanized coal mining face,” Powder Technology, vol. 339, pp. 354–367, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Han, G. Zhou, Q. Zhang, H. Pan, and D. Liu, “Experimental study on modification of physicochemical characteristics of acidified coal by surfactants and ionic liquids,” Fuel, vol. 266, p. 116966, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Yu, J. Zhang, C. Zhang, X. Xin, and H. Li, “The coupling effects of soil organic matter and particle interaction forces on soil aggregate stability,” Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 174, p. 251, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. B. Han, G. Zhou, M. Y. Xing et al., “Experimental investigation on physicochemical characteristics of coal treated with synthetic sodium salicylate–imidazole ionic liquids,” Journal of Molecular Liquids, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
G. Zhou, Q. Zhang, R. BAI, T. FAN, and G. WANG, “The diffusion behavior law of respirable dust at fully mechanized caving face in coal mine: CFD numerical simulation and engineering application,” Process Safety and Environmental Protection, vol. 106, pp. 117–128, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Zhang, J. Crittenden, K. Li, and Y. Chen, “Attachment efficiency of nanoparticle aggregation in aqueous dispersions: modeling and experimental validation,” Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 46, no. 13, p. 7054, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Zhou, Y. Ma, T. Fan, and G. Wang, “Preparation and characteristics of a multifunctional dust suppressant with agglomeration and wettability performance used in coal mine,” Chemical Engineering Research and Design, vol. 132, pp. 729–742, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. J. Chinchalikar, V. K. Aswal, J. Kohlbrecher, and A. G. Wagh, “Evolution of structure and interaction during aggregation of silica nanoparticles in aqueous electrolyte solution,” Chemical Physics Letters, vol. 542, p. 74, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. J. Feng, T. Tao, Y. C. Zhu, and Z. Yun, “Transport kinetics of pollutants in in-situ leaching of ionic type rare-earth ore,” Procedia Environmental Sciences, no. 12, p. 917, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. X. Li, J. N. Tullberg, D. M. Freebairn, and H. W. Li, “Functional relationships between soil water infiltration and wheeling and rainfall energy,” Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 104, no. 1, p. 156, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. A. Ducker and R. M. Pashley, “Forces between mica surfaces in the presence of rod-shaped divalent counterions,” Langmuir, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 109, 1992.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Leng, “Hydration force between mica surfaces in aqueous KCl electrolyte solution,” Langmuir, vol. 28, no. 12, p. 5339, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Hou, H. Li, H. Zhu, and L. Wu, “Determination of clay surface potential: a more reliable approach,” Soil Science Society of America Journal, vol. 73, no. 5, p. 1658, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Li, C. L. Qing, S. Q. Wei, and X. J. Jiang, “An approach to the method for determination of surface potential on solid/liquid interface: Theory,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 275, no. 1, p. 172, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Liu, H. Li, R. Li, and R. Tian, “Analytical solutions of the nonlinear Poisson-Boltzmann equation in mixture of electrolytes,” Surface Science, vol. 607, p. 197, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Q. Ding, X. M. Liu, S. Li et al., “An approach to estimate the position of the shear plane for colloidal particles in an electrophoresis experiment,” Surface Science, vol. 632, no. 50, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Liu, R. Tian, W. Du, R. Li, W. Ding, and H. Li, “A theory to determine the surface potentials of clay particles in electrolyte solutions,” Applied Clay Science, vol. 169, p. 112, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. X. Luo, H. Li, W. Q. Ding, F. N. Hu, and S. Li, “Effects of DLVO, hydration and osmotic forces among soil particles on water infiltration,” European Journal of Soil Science, vol. 69, no. 4, p. 710, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Hu, J. Liu, C. Xu et al., “Soil internal forces initiate aggregate breakdown and splash erosion,” Geoderma, vol. 320, p. 43, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Ding, X. Liu, F. Hu et al., “The effect of interactions between particles on soil infiltrability,” Journal of Soils and Sediments, vol. 19, no. 10, p. 3489, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Miao and E. Bi, “Effects of soil components and solution inorganic cations on interactions of imidazolium-based ionic liquid with soils,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 223, p. 975, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Liu, C. Sun, S. B. Chen, X. Q. Zhang, W. E. Song, and N. Li, “Dynamic characteristics and ageing factors of Cd added to paddy soils with various properties,” Zhongguo Huanjing Kexue/China Environmental Science, vol. 35, no. 7, p. 2137, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2021 Jie Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Advances in Civil Engineering

Effects of Concentration of Pore Solution on Stability of Ion-Absorbed Rare Earth Ore Aggregate

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Model Building

2.1. Calculation of the Interaction Forces among Ore Particles

2.2. Van der Waals Forces between Ore Particles

2.3. Hydration Repulsion among Ore Particles

2.4. Electrostatic Repulsion between Ore Particles

2.4.1. Electrostatic Repulsion between Particles

2.4.2. Calculation of Potential on Ore Particle Surface

2.4.3. Calculation of ψ(x) on Ore Particle Surface

2.5. Thickness of the Sliding Layer in Electric Double Layer

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Sample Preparation

3.2. Mineral Leaching Experiment Method

3.3. Ore Gradation Experiment Method

3.4. Zeta Potential Test Method on Ore Particle Surfaces

4. Results and Discussion

4.1. Variation Law of Interaction Force between Ore Particles

4.1.1. Calculation of Thickness of Sliding Layer on Ore Particle Surface

4.1.2. Calculation of Electrostatic Repulsive Force between Ore Particles

4.1.3. Calculation of Net Force between Ore Particles

4.2. Effects of (NH4)2SO4 Solution Concentration on the Stability of Ore Aggregate

4.2.1. Determining the Critical (NH4)2SO4 Solution Concentration at Particle Size Less Than 0.075 mm

4.2.2. Effects of CEC on Critical (NH4)2SO4 Solution Concentration

5. Conclusions

Notations

Data Availability

Conflicts of Interest

Acknowledgments

References

Copyright

4.2. Effects of (NH₄)₂SO₄ Solution Concentration on the Stability of Ore Aggregate

4.2.1. Determining the Critical (NH₄)₂SO₄ Solution Concentration at Particle Size Less Than 0.075 mm

4.2.2. Effects of CEC on Critical (NH₄)₂SO₄ Solution Concentration