Research Article

Studying the Role of Personality Traits on the Evacuation Choice Behavior Pattern in Urban Road Network in Different Severity Scales of Natural Disaster

Table 4

The abridged form of questionnaire.

Section 1: Socioeconomic characteristics
GenderMaleFemale
Marital statusMarriedSingle
Age18–24 years25–32 years33–45 years
46–55 years56–69 years+70 years
EducationDiploma and belowBachelorMastersDoctorate
JobEmployeeManagerSelf-employedDoctor
Faculty memberStudentHousewifeRetired
JoblessOther
Family IncomeIncome……………….
Number of family membersNo. of family members………….
Geographical location of residenceNorthern PartsCentral PartsSouthern Parts
Access to vehicle at emergency situationsNo accessAccess to vehicle as a driverAccess to vehicle as an occupant

Section 2: Daily trips’ characteristics
Purpose of daily tripsEducationWorkEntertainment
ShoppingPersonal affairsOther
Traffic condition in daily tripsVery congestedCongestedNormal
UncongestedVery uncongested
Familiarity with alternative routesCompletely unfamiliar (≤5%)Unfamiliar (5%–20%)Normal (20%–50%)
Familiar (50%–80%)Completely familiar (≥80%)

Section 3 (Revealed scenario1): Answer to this section according to your decision on the earthquake on December20, 2017 , 23: 27.
Did you choose evacuation in response to earthquake on December 20, 2017?YesNo

Section 4 (Designated scenarios): In the questionnaire, the following question is repeated for each of the designated scenarios and people are asked to answer the question according to the severity and time of the earthquake in each of the scenarios.
Do you choose evacuation in response to this scenario?YesNo

Section 5: NEO-FFI