Research Article
Determining the Height of Water-Flowing Fractured Zone in Bedrock-Soil Layer in a Jurassic Coalfield in Northern Shaanxi, China
Table 5
Comparison between the results obtained by microresistivity scanning imaging and simple hydrology observation of soil layer.
| Drilling | Interpretation of fractures by microresistivity scanning imaging | Fractures of simple hydrological observation | Comparative results | Ratio of the water-flowing fractured zone to the mining height | Depth of the fractures (m) | Fracture numbers/article | Depth of the fractures (m) | Water level existence | Rate of water level decline (m∙min-1) | Drilling flushing fluid consumption per unit time (L∙s-1) |
| Drilling 8 | 21.8 | 2 | 21.92 | No | — | 1.3 | No water level; total pump leakage. The rock mass is broken. Those two methods confirm each other better | 28.5 | 29.9 | 29.12 | No | — | 1.3 |
| Drilling 9 | 7.8–7.9 | 4 | 7.79 | Yes | 0.026 | 0.6933 | The water level declines to zero and the rate of decline suddenly changes | 28.3 | 18.4 | 16.67 | Yes | 0.380 | 0.7917 | No water level; total pump leakage. Those two methods confirm each other better | 22.4 | 22.97 | No | — | 2.0742 |
|
|