Research Article
Study and Design Analysis of Hazard Removal and Reinforcement Scheme of a Bridge Diversion Sluice
Table 1
Weights of scheme evaluation factors.
| Evaluation criteria | Normalized by cluster | Factors | Normalized by cluster |
| Project investment (A) | 0.3625 | Construction budget (A1) | 0.5067 | Equipment and installation costs (A2) | 0.3114 | Temporary work cost (A3) | 0.1179 | Land acquisition and immigration costs (A4) | 0.0640 |
| Scheme reliability (B) | 0.2779 | Safety (B1) | 0.4416 | Applicability (B2) | 0.3972 | Durability (B3) | 0.1612 |
| Construction period (C) | 0.1082 | Construction organization design (C1) | 0.2707 | Policy requirement (C2) | 0.6087 | Natural environment (C3) | 0.1205 |
| Difficulty of construction (D) | 0.1909 | Construction technology (D1) | 0.0891 | Construction geological condition (D2) | 0.2462 | Resource allocation (D3) | 0.6646 |
| Environmental impact (E) | 0.0605 | Waste discharge (E1) | 0.5912 | Ecotope (E2) | 0.2748 | Noise (E3) | 0.1340 |
|
|