Research Article
Study on Bearing Capacity of the Existing Engineering Pile Group without Lateral Displacement during Dynamic Top-Down Construction
Table 2
Comparison of the bearing capacity with the compression buckling effect.
| Case diameter of the pile body (mm) | Hinged pile top | 600 | 700 | 900 |
| Present solution | Linear effective length coefficient | u | 1.486 | 1.577 | 1.769 | Nonlinear effective length coefficient | uc = βu | 1.783 | 1.892 | 2.123 | Nonlinear effective length (m) | lc1 = βul0 | 8.915 | 9.460 | 10.615 | Compression buckling coefficient | φ1 | 0.836 | 0.882 | 0.924 | Stability capacity with compression buckling (kN) | Nu1 | 2530 | 3640 | 6304 |
| Code solution | Effective length with compression buckling (m) | lc = 0.7(l0 + 4/α) | 11.142 | 11.971 | 13.497 | Compression buckling coefficient | φ | 0.661 | 0.748 | 0.830 | Stability capacity with compression buckling (kN) | Nu | 2004 | 3087 | 5663 | | | Nu1/Nu | 1.26 | 1.18 | 1.11 |
|
|