Research Article
Quality Risk Evaluation of Urban Rail Transit Construction Based on AHP–FCE Method
Table 3
Reliability analysis based on Cronbach’s α coefficient for the indicators.
| C | Cronbach α | C | Cronbach α | C | Cronbach α | C | Cronbach α |
| Technical level of construction personnel C11 | 0.707 | Maintenance of machinery and equipment C22 | 0.833 | Stockpiling of construction materials C33 | 0.711 | Production of construction site samples C44 | 0.725 |
| Specification of construction personnel C12 | 0.812 | Failure rate of machinery and equipment C23 | 0.761 | Waterproofing of construction materials C34 | 0.901 | Geology of the construction site C51 | 0.783 |
| Management level of managers C13 | 0.760 | Level of monitoring of equipment C24 | 0.739 | Soundness of programming C41 | 0.930 | Buildings around the construction site C52 | 0.710 |
| Safety awareness for construction workers C14 | 0.753 | Quality of materials on construction sites C31 | 0.863 | Feasibility of construction handover C42 | 0.839 | Undercutting of municipal pipelines C53 | 0.828 |
| Performance of machinery and equipment C21 | 0.791 | Availability of construction materials C32 | 0.782 | Stability of formwork supports C43 | 0.759 | Environment of the construction site C54 | 0.804 | Cronbach α: 0.789 > 0.7 |
|
|
Note: Cronbach α ( α = 0.9: excellent; α = 0.8: good; α = 0.7: acceptable; α = 0.6: questionable; α = 0.5: poor; α < 0.5: unacceptable) [ 34, 35]. |