Research Article

Field-Scale Experimental Study on Thermomechanical Behaviors of Super-Long and Large-Diameter Energy Piles under Liquefied Natural Gas Tank

Table 1

Comparison of heat transfer performances for different types of energy piles.

ReferenceTube configurationPile type (diameter/length; m)Ground conditionGroundwater conditionTesting conditions (temperature/flow rate)Performance (W/m)
Radius (inner/outer; mm)Shape

Gao et al. [31]20/−1U/2U/3U/WConcrete (0.6/25)Sandy siltN.A.Constant inlet temperature (35°C/0.342 m3/hr)58/89/108/83
Jalaluddin et al. [32](40/48)/(26/33)/(20/25)1U/2U/multi-USteel (0.1398/20)Clay/sand and sandy clayN.A.Constant inlet temperature (27°C/4 L/min)30.4/49.6/34.8
Zarrella et al. [33]16/203U/coil (75/150/350 mm pitch)Concrete (0.5/12)N.A.N.A.Constant inlet temperature (−/0.09 kg/s) (simulated)107/123/120/113
Yoon et al. [34]16/20W/coil (50 mm pitch)PHC ((0.4/13.27)/(0.4/12.8))Weathered granite soil/stiff weathered rock4.5 m below pile top without groundwater flowConstant inlet temperature (30°C/−)95/120
Park et al. [35]21/27Coil (200/500 mm pitch)Concrete ((1.5/14)/(1.5/12.5))Silty sand with gravel/weathered rock/gneissN.A.Constant inlet temperature ((−/20.33 L/min)/(−/29.17 L/min)) (intermittent)285/248
This work26/323UConcrete (1.2/53)Clayey soil/silty to gravelly sand/weathered sandstone3.2–4.4 m below ground surface with groundwater flowConstant inlet temperature ((38°C/1.8 m3/hr)/(7°C/1.8 m3/hr))178 (heating)/91 (cooling)