Research Article
Insights into Wall-Jet Scouring Characterization with the Kinect Device: Benefits and Limitations
Table 2
Scour-hole characteristics comparison through Kinect device for different hydraulic scenarios.
| | Name | Condition | V (cm3) | hmax (cm) | yS (cm) | W (cm) | XL (cm) |
| | Case 1 | Wet conditions | Value | 5350 | 9.94 | −7.55 | 26.73 | 62.53 | | Error (%) | 3.2 | 0.6 | 0.66 | 7 | 3.88 | | Dry conditions | Value | 5230 | 9.84 | −7.6 | 29.5 | 64.42 | | Error (%) | 1.1 | 1.62 | 1.32 | 3.4 | 6.7 |
| | Case 2 | Wet condition | Value | 2200 | 7.8 | −5.8 | 20.5 | 51.91 | | Error (%) | 6.7 | 1.26 | 1.75 | 11.22 | 5.41 |
| | Case 3 | Wet condition | Value | 2870 | 6.7 | −4.9 | 20.6 | 52.8 | | Error (%) | 9.1 | 4.28 | 2 | 6.8 | 7 |
|
|
